CNBS vs. SHV
CNBS (Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF) and SHV (iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CNBS is a Cannabis fund actively managed by Amplify, while SHV is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE Short US Treasury Securities Index. CNBS is actively managed, while SHV is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CNBS returned -32.48%/yr vs 3.32%/yr for SHV. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. CNBS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SHV.
Performance
CNBS vs. SHV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNBS achieves a 4.70% return, which is significantly higher than SHV's 1.43% return.
CNBS
- 1D
- 6.54%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 4.70%
- 6M
- 26.27%
- 1Y
- 91.63%
- 3Y*
- -0.72%
- 5Y*
- -32.48%
- 10Y*
- —
SHV
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 3.90%
- 3Y*
- 4.65%
- 5Y*
- 3.32%
- 10Y*
- 2.22%
CNBS vs. SHV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNBS Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF | 4.70% | 15.33% | -29.41% | -16.11% | -63.98% | -19.02% | 31.94% | -44.97% |
SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 1.43% | 4.21% | 5.12% | 5.04% | 0.94% | -0.10% | 0.81% | 0.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNBS and SHV is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2019 | -0.05 |
The correlation between CNBS and SHV shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to -0.01 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNBS vs. SHV — Risk / Return Rank
CNBS
SHV
CNBS vs. SHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) and iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNBS | SHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -18.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -147.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 53.77 | -52.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 431.38 | -429.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.30 | 2,419.80 | -2,416.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNBS | SHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 19.49 | -18.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.50 | 11.56 | -12.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 8.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.39 | 4.50 | -4.89 |
Drawdowns
CNBS vs. SHV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNBS drawdown since its inception was -95.71%, which is greater than SHV's maximum drawdown of -0.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNBS and SHV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNBS | SHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.71% | -0.45% | -95.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.25% | -0.01% | -51.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -73.41% | -0.03% | -73.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -93.58% | -0.40% | -93.18% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -0.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.88% | 0.00% | -90.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.27% | -0.03% | -71.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.83% | 0.00% | +27.83% |
Volatility
CNBS vs. SHV - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) has a higher volatility of 18.65% compared to iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) at 0.05%. This indicates that CNBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNBS | SHV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.65% | 0.05% | +18.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 76.84% | 0.12% | +76.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 105.28% | 0.20% | +105.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.80% | 0.29% | +64.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.37% | 0.28% | +61.09% |
CNBS vs. SHV - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNBS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SHV's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNBS vs. SHV - Dividend Comparison
CNBS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNBS Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 43.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.58% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 3.83% | 4.09% | 5.02% | 4.73% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.74% | 2.19% | 1.66% | 0.72% | 0.34% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CNBS and SHV have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CNBS has higher volatility (18.65%) compared to SHV (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNBS dropped -95.71% vs SHV's -0.45%.
On 5-year performance, SHV leads with 3.32% vs -32.48% for CNBS. On fees, SHV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SHV has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SHV has performed better with a 3.32% return vs -32.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SHV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CNBS.
SHV has the higher dividend yield at 3.83%, compared with 0.00% for CNBS.
CNBS is categorized as Cannabis, while SHV is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Amplify and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CNBS and 0.15% for SHV.
SHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.49 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CNBS and SHV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer