PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNBS vs. DIVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CNBS vs. DIVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNBS achieves a 4.70% return, which is significantly lower than DIVO's 6.64% return.


CNBS

1D
6.54%
1M
0.77%
YTD
4.70%
6M
26.27%
1Y
91.63%
3Y*
-0.72%
5Y*
-32.48%
10Y*

DIVO

1D
1.04%
1M
2.83%
YTD
6.64%
6M
6.60%
1Y
19.81%
3Y*
15.86%
5Y*
10.84%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CNBS vs. DIVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CNBS
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF
4.70%15.33%-29.41%-16.11%-63.98%-19.02%31.94%-44.97%
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
6.64%17.40%16.22%6.95%-1.46%22.87%12.40%5.58%

Correlation

The correlation between CNBS and DIVO is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2019

0.32

The correlation between CNBS and DIVO shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CNBS vs. DIVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CNBS
DIVO

Healthcare

63.1%
6.7%

Real Estate

13.8%

-

Technology

10.7%
14.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.0%
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

3.4%
11.6%

Financial Services

1.9%
30.3%

Industrials

0.1%
16.2%

Basic Materials

-

4.1%

Communication Services

-

1.0%

Energy

-

6.8%

Utilities

-

2.0%

Healthcare

CNBS
63.1%
DIVO
6.7%

Real Estate

CNBS
13.8%
DIVO

-

Technology

CNBS
10.7%
DIVO
14.5%

Consumer Defensive

CNBS
7.0%
DIVO
6.9%

Consumer Cyclical

CNBS
3.4%
DIVO
11.6%

Financial Services

CNBS
1.9%
DIVO
30.3%

Industrials

CNBS
0.1%
DIVO
16.2%

Basic Materials

CNBS

-

DIVO
4.1%

Communication Services

CNBS

-

DIVO
1.0%

Energy

CNBS

-

DIVO
6.8%

Utilities

CNBS

-

DIVO
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNBS vs. DIVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CNBS
CNBS Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
CNBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNBS Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
CNBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNBS Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

DIVO
DIVO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
DIVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DIVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
DIVO Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
DIVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
DIVO Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CNBS vs. DIVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CNBSDIVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.39

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

3.35

-1.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.30

12.08

-8.78

CNBS vs. DIVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNBS Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the DIVO Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNBS and DIVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CNBSDIVODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

2.21

-1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.50

0.91

-1.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.39

0.86

-1.25

Drawdowns

CNBS vs. DIVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNBS drawdown since its inception was -95.71%, which is greater than DIVO's maximum drawdown of -30.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNBS and DIVO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNBSDIVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.71%

-30.04%

-65.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-51.25%

-5.95%

-45.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-73.41%

-12.12%

-61.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-93.58%

-13.72%

-79.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-90.88%

0.00%

-90.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-71.27%

-2.61%

-68.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.83%

1.64%

+26.19%

Volatility

CNBS vs. DIVO - Volatility Comparison

Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) has a higher volatility of 18.65% compared to Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) at 2.17%. This indicates that CNBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNBSDIVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.65%

2.17%

+16.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

76.84%

6.95%

+69.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

105.28%

9.03%

+96.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

64.80%

11.94%

+52.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.37%

14.84%

+46.53%

CNBS vs. DIVO - Expense Ratio Comparison

CNBS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVO's 0.56% expense ratio.


Dividends

CNBS vs. DIVO - Dividend Comparison

CNBS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DIVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.35%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CNBS
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF
0.00%0.00%43.54%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.58%0.58%0.00%0.00%
DIVO
Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF
6.35%6.44%4.70%4.67%4.76%4.79%4.91%8.16%5.27%3.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


CNBS and DIVO have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CNBS has higher volatility (18.65%) compared to DIVO (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNBS dropped -95.71% vs DIVO's -30.04%.

On 5-year performance, DIVO leads with 10.84% vs -32.48% for CNBS. On fees, DIVO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, DIVO has been the lower-risk option at 2.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DIVO has performed better with a 10.84% return vs -32.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DIVO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CNBS.

DIVO has the higher dividend yield at 6.35%, compared with 0.00% for CNBS.

CNBS is categorized as Cannabis, while DIVO is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CNBS and 0.56% for DIVO.

DIVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNBS and DIVO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer