CNBS vs. DIVO
CNBS (Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF) and DIVO (Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CNBS is a Cannabis fund actively managed by Amplify, while DIVO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Amplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, CNBS returned -32.48%/yr vs 10.84%/yr for DIVO. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CNBS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.56%/yr for DIVO.
Performance
CNBS vs. DIVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNBS achieves a 4.70% return, which is significantly lower than DIVO's 6.64% return.
CNBS
- 1D
- 6.54%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 4.70%
- 6M
- 26.27%
- 1Y
- 91.63%
- 3Y*
- -0.72%
- 5Y*
- -32.48%
- 10Y*
- —
DIVO
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 2.83%
- YTD
- 6.64%
- 6M
- 6.60%
- 1Y
- 19.81%
- 3Y*
- 15.86%
- 5Y*
- 10.84%
- 10Y*
- —
CNBS vs. DIVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNBS Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF | 4.70% | 15.33% | -29.41% | -16.11% | -63.98% | -19.02% | 31.94% | -44.97% |
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 6.64% | 17.40% | 16.22% | 6.95% | -1.46% | 22.87% | 12.40% | 5.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNBS and DIVO is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2019 | 0.32 |
The correlation between CNBS and DIVO shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CNBS vs. DIVO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CNBS
DIVO
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Healthcare
CNBS
DIVO
Real Estate
CNBS
DIVO
-
Technology
CNBS
DIVO
Consumer Defensive
CNBS
DIVO
Consumer Cyclical
CNBS
DIVO
Financial Services
CNBS
DIVO
Industrials
CNBS
DIVO
Basic Materials
CNBS
-
DIVO
Communication Services
CNBS
-
DIVO
Energy
CNBS
-
DIVO
Utilities
CNBS
-
DIVO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNBS vs. DIVO — Risk / Return Rank
CNBS
DIVO
CNBS vs. DIVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) and Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CNBS | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.39 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.80 | 3.35 | -1.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.30 | 12.08 | -8.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CNBS | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 2.21 | -1.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.50 | 0.91 | -1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.39 | 0.86 | -1.25 |
Drawdowns
CNBS vs. DIVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNBS drawdown since its inception was -95.71%, which is greater than DIVO's maximum drawdown of -30.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNBS and DIVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNBS | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.71% | -30.04% | -65.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.25% | -5.95% | -45.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -73.41% | -12.12% | -61.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -93.58% | -13.72% | -79.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.88% | 0.00% | -90.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -71.27% | -2.61% | -68.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.83% | 1.64% | +26.19% |
Volatility
CNBS vs. DIVO - Volatility Comparison
Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF (CNBS) has a higher volatility of 18.65% compared to Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF (DIVO) at 2.17%. This indicates that CNBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DIVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNBS | DIVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.65% | 2.17% | +16.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 76.84% | 6.95% | +69.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 105.28% | 9.03% | +96.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 64.80% | 11.94% | +52.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.37% | 14.84% | +46.53% |
CNBS vs. DIVO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CNBS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than DIVO's 0.56% expense ratio.
Dividends
CNBS vs. DIVO - Dividend Comparison
CNBS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DIVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.35%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNBS Amplify Seymour Cannabis ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 43.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.58% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DIVO Amplify CWP Enhanced Dividend Income ETF | 6.35% | 6.44% | 4.70% | 4.67% | 4.76% | 4.79% | 4.91% | 8.16% | 5.27% | 3.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CNBS and DIVO have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CNBS has higher volatility (18.65%) compared to DIVO (2.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNBS dropped -95.71% vs DIVO's -30.04%.
On 5-year performance, DIVO leads with 10.84% vs -32.48% for CNBS. On fees, DIVO is cheaper at 0.56% per year. On volatility, DIVO has been the lower-risk option at 2.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, DIVO has performed better with a 10.84% return vs -32.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIVO is cheaper with a 0.56% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CNBS.
DIVO has the higher dividend yield at 6.35%, compared with 0.00% for CNBS.
CNBS is categorized as Cannabis, while DIVO is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CNBS and 0.56% for DIVO.
DIVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CNBS and DIVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer