CNA.L vs. LSEG.L
CNA.L (Centrica plc) and LSEG.L (London Stock Exchange Group plc) are both stocks. CNA.L operates in Utilities - Independent Power Producers (Utilities), while LSEG.L operates in Financial Data & Stock Exchanges (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, CNA.L returned -0.56%/yr vs 13.84%/yr for LSEG.L. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CNA.L vs. LSEG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CNA.L achieves a 3.34% return, which is significantly higher than LSEG.L's -0.09% return. Over the past 10 years, CNA.L has underperformed LSEG.L with an annualized return of -0.56%, while LSEG.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.84% annualized return.
CNA.L
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- 6M
- -3.41%
- YTD
- 3.34%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- 13.62%
- 5Y*
- 30.30%
- 10Y*
- -0.56%
- ALL TIME*
- 1.26%
LSEG.L
- 1D
- -1.49%
- 1M
- 4.54%
- 6M
- -1.52%
- YTD
- -0.09%
- 1Y
- -16.99%
- 3Y*
- 3.51%
- 5Y*
- 4.57%
- 10Y*
- 13.84%
- ALL TIME*
- 13.01%
CNA.L vs. LSEG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNA.L Centrica plc | 3.34% | 30.75% | -2.72% | 48.58% | 36.41% | 53.43% | -47.82% | -28.45% | 2.36% | -38.56% |
LSEG.L London Stock Exchange Group plc | -0.09% | -19.64% | 23.26% | 31.78% | 4.28% | -22.30% | 17.31% | 92.96% | 8.43% | 31.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between CNA.L and LSEG.L is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2006 | 0.20 |
The correlation between CNA.L and LSEG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (5 years) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CNA.L:
£7.80B
LSEG.L:
£43.06B
CNA.L:
£1.20
LSEG.L:
£3.71
CNA.L:
1.43
LSEG.L:
23.86
CNA.L:
0.00
LSEG.L:
0.68
CNA.L:
0.06
LSEG.L:
2.54
CNA.L:
0.64
LSEG.L:
2.33
CNA.L:
£34.34B
LSEG.L:
£18.17B
CNA.L:
£13.44B
LSEG.L:
£8.45B
CNA.L:
£7.91B
LSEG.L:
£7.44B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CNA.L vs. LSEG.L — Risk / Return Rank
CNA.L
LSEG.L
CNA.L vs. LSEG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Centrica plc (CNA.L) and London Stock Exchange Group plc (LSEG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CNA.L | LSEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 0.93 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.71 | -0.52 | +1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.98 | -1.00 | +2.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CNA.L vs. LSEG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CNA.L drawdown since its inception was -89.95%, which is greater than LSEG.L's maximum drawdown of -80.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNA.L and LSEG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CNA.L | LSEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.95% | -80.59% | -9.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.91% | -32.36% | +10.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.42% | -39.94% | +8.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.42% | -39.94% | +8.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.09% | -39.94% | -45.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.65% | -25.09% | -11.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -37.00% | -20.37% | -16.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.84% | 16.20% | -8.36% |
Volatility
CNA.L vs. LSEG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Centrica plc (CNA.L) is 6.22%, while London Stock Exchange Group plc (LSEG.L) has a volatility of 7.56%. This indicates that CNA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSEG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CNA.L | LSEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.22% | 7.56% | -1.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.48% | 26.73% | -6.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.62% | 33.44% | -7.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.98% | 24.18% | +3.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.93% | 25.21% | +7.72% |
Dividends
CNA.L vs. LSEG.L - Dividend Comparison
CNA.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.19%, more than LSEG.L's 1.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNA.L Centrica plc | 3.19% | 2.85% | 2.32% | 1.76% | 0.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.23% | 4.62% | 6.49% | 3.82% | 4.08% |
LSEG.L London Stock Exchange Group plc | 1.70% | 1.52% | 1.07% | 1.20% | 1.43% | 1.11% | 0.81% | 0.82% | 1.34% | 1.20% | 1.28% | 0.86% |
Financials
CNA.L vs. LSEG.L - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Centrica plc and London Stock Exchange Group plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CNA.L vs. LSEG.L - Profitability Comparison
CNA.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Centrica plc reported a gross profit of 3.06B and revenue of 9.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.7%.
LSEG.L - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, London Stock Exchange Group plc reported a gross profit of 1.87B and revenue of 4.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.2%.
CNA.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Centrica plc reported an operating income of 1.89B and revenue of 9.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.1%.
LSEG.L - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, London Stock Exchange Group plc reported an operating income of 1.08B and revenue of 4.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.1%.
CNA.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Centrica plc reported a net income of 179.00M and revenue of 9.37B, resulting in a net margin of 1.9%.
LSEG.L - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, London Stock Exchange Group plc reported a net income of 600.00M and revenue of 4.66B, resulting in a net margin of 12.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CNA.L and LSEG.L have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CNA.L and LSEG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer