PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMWAY vs. CSCO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CMWAY vs. CSCO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Commonwealth Bank of Australia PK (CMWAY) and Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMWAY achieves a 11.39% return, which is significantly lower than CSCO's 66.00% return. Over the past 10 years, CMWAY has underperformed CSCO with an annualized return of 13.10%, while CSCO has yielded a comparatively higher 19.37% annualized return.


CMWAY

1D
-0.62%
1M
-4.90%
YTD
11.39%
6M
18.01%
1Y
3.80%
3Y*
26.05%
5Y*
12.02%
10Y*
13.10%

CSCO

1D
-1.17%
1M
36.56%
YTD
66.00%
6M
64.46%
1Y
101.07%
3Y*
40.06%
5Y*
21.97%
10Y*
19.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMWAY vs. CSCO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMWAY
Commonwealth Bank of Australia PK
11.39%14.67%30.16%14.01%-1.83%21.14%17.04%17.00%-13.84%13.44%
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.
66.00%33.47%21.00%9.30%-22.46%45.76%-3.49%13.81%16.57%31.27%

Correlation

The correlation between CMWAY and CSCO is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2009

0.36

The correlation between CMWAY and CSCO shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.38 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CMWAY:

$196.16B

CSCO:

$504.36B

EPS

CMWAY:

$11.73

CSCO:

$3.00

PE Ratio

CMWAY:

9.99

CSCO:

42.21

PEG Ratio

CMWAY:

1.95

CSCO:

35.41

PS Ratio

CMWAY:

1.68

CSCO:

8.31

PB Ratio

CMWAY:

2.54

CSCO:

10.32

Total Revenue (TTM)

CMWAY:

$116.83B

CSCO:

$60.75B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CMWAY:

$77.16B

CSCO:

$39.08B

EBITDA (TTM)

CMWAY:

$15.17B

CSCO:

$13.98B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMWAY vs. CSCO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMWAY
CMWAY Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
CMWAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMWAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMWAY Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
CMWAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMWAY Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

CSCO
CSCO Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
CSCO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSCO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSCO Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
CSCO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSCO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMWAY vs. CSCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Commonwealth Bank of Australia PK (CMWAY) and Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMWAYCSCODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.61

-0.56

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.18

7.49

-7.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.35

21.00

-20.65

CMWAY vs. CSCO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMWAY Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the CSCO Sharpe Ratio of 3.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMWAY and CSCO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMWAYCSCODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

3.40

-3.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

0.90

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.75

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.61

-0.19

Drawdowns

CMWAY vs. CSCO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMWAY drawdown since its inception was -47.71%, smaller than the maximum CSCO drawdown of -89.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMWAY and CSCO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMWAYCSCODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.71%

-89.26%

+41.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.74%

-13.57%

-8.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.74%

-20.16%

-1.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.39%

-36.68%

+10.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.71%

-41.95%

-5.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.35%

-1.17%

-10.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.62%

-40.14%

+30.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.73%

4.83%

+5.90%

Volatility

CMWAY vs. CSCO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Commonwealth Bank of Australia PK (CMWAY) is 13.69%, while Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) has a volatility of 15.37%. This indicates that CMWAY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMWAYCSCODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.69%

15.37%

-1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.45%

25.85%

-3.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.89%

29.87%

-1.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.03%

24.62%

+1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.16%

25.76%

+1.40%

Dividends

CMWAY vs. CSCO - Dividend Comparison

CMWAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, more than CSCO's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMWAY
Commonwealth Bank of Australia PK
2.87%2.92%3.19%3.96%3.89%3.52%3.20%5.24%6.36%7.63%10.91%5.13%
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.
1.30%2.12%2.69%3.07%3.17%2.32%3.20%2.88%2.95%2.95%3.28%3.02%

Financials

CMWAY vs. CSCO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Commonwealth Bank of Australia PK and Cisco Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B202120222023202420252026
34.13B
15.84B
(CMWAY) Total Revenue
(CSCO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CMWAY vs. CSCO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Commonwealth Bank of Australia PK and Cisco Systems, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%202120222023202420252026
42.5%
63.6%
Portfolio components
CMWAY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Commonwealth Bank of Australia PK reported a gross profit of 14.50B and revenue of 34.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.5%.

CSCO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cisco Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 10.08B and revenue of 15.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.6%.

CMWAY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Commonwealth Bank of Australia PK reported an operating income of 7.62B and revenue of 34.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.3%.

CSCO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cisco Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.96B and revenue of 15.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 25.0%.

CMWAY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Commonwealth Bank of Australia PK reported a net income of 4.89B and revenue of 34.13B, resulting in a net margin of 14.3%.

CSCO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cisco Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 3.37B and revenue of 15.84B, resulting in a net margin of 21.3%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CMWAY and CSCO have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSCO has higher volatility (15.37%) compared to CMWAY (13.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMWAY dropped -47.71% vs CSCO's -89.26%.

CSCO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.40 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMWAY and CSCO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer