PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMWAY vs. GS
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

CMWAY vs. GS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Commonwealth Bank of Australia PK (CMWAY) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CMWAY vs. GS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMWAY
Commonwealth Bank of Australia PK
12.25%14.67%30.16%14.01%-1.83%21.14%17.04%17.00%-13.84%13.44%
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
-3.25%56.64%52.03%15.91%-7.87%47.61%17.45%40.48%-33.53%7.73%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CMWAY:

$197.68B

GS:

$268.69B

EPS

CMWAY:

$11.73

GS:

$54.19

PE Ratio

CMWAY:

10.06

GS:

15.61

PEG Ratio

CMWAY:

1.97

GS:

2.02

PS Ratio

CMWAY:

1.69

GS:

2.14

PB Ratio

CMWAY:

2.56

GS:

2.15

Total Revenue (TTM)

CMWAY:

$116.83B

GS:

$125.10B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CMWAY:

$77.16B

GS:

$57.17B

EBITDA (TTM)

CMWAY:

$15.17B

GS:

$21.81B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMWAY achieves a 12.25% return, which is significantly higher than GS's -3.25% return. Over the past 10 years, CMWAY has underperformed GS with an annualized return of 13.12%, while GS has yielded a comparatively higher 20.59% annualized return.


CMWAY

1D
1.72%
1M
-5.06%
YTD
12.25%
6M
8.69%
1Y
28.11%
3Y*
25.71%
5Y*
16.50%
10Y*
13.12%

GS

1D
4.75%
1M
-1.06%
YTD
-3.25%
6M
7.32%
1Y
58.07%
3Y*
40.67%
5Y*
23.83%
10Y*
20.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMWAY vs. GS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMWAY
CMWAY Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
CMWAY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMWAY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMWAY Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
CMWAY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMWAY Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

GS
GS Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
GS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
GS Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
GS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
GS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMWAY vs. GS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Commonwealth Bank of Australia PK (CMWAY) and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMWAYGSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.93

1.82

-0.89

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.48

2.35

-0.86

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.33

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.38

3.04

-1.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.91

9.70

-6.78

CMWAY vs. GS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMWAY Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the GS Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMWAY and GS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMWAYGSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

1.82

-0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.87

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

0.70

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.43

0.31

+0.12

Correlation

The correlation between CMWAY and GS is 0.39, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CMWAY vs. GS - Dividend Comparison

CMWAY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than GS's 1.83% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMWAY
Commonwealth Bank of Australia PK
2.85%2.92%3.19%3.96%3.89%3.52%3.20%5.24%6.36%7.63%10.91%5.13%
GS
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.
1.83%1.59%2.01%2.72%2.62%1.70%1.90%1.80%1.89%1.14%1.09%1.41%

Drawdowns

CMWAY vs. GS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMWAY drawdown since its inception was -47.71%, smaller than the maximum GS drawdown of -78.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMWAY and GS.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CMWAYGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.71%

-78.84%

+31.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.74%

-19.42%

-2.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.39%

-32.84%

+6.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.71%

-48.75%

+1.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.70%

-12.85%

+5.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.65%

-22.75%

+13.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.28%

6.08%

+4.20%

Volatility

CMWAY vs. GS - Volatility Comparison

Commonwealth Bank of Australia PK (CMWAY) has a higher volatility of 9.99% compared to The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (GS) at 9.44%. This indicates that CMWAY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CMWAYGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.99%

9.44%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.58%

21.70%

-2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.51%

32.11%

-1.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.44%

27.68%

-2.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.95%

29.71%

-2.76%

Financials

CMWAY vs. GS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Commonwealth Bank of Australia PK and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B20212022202320242025
34.13B
30.13B
(CMWAY) Total Revenue
(GS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CMWAY vs. GS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Commonwealth Bank of Australia PK and The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
42.5%
44.3%
Portfolio components
CMWAY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Commonwealth Bank of Australia PK reported a gross profit of 14.50B and revenue of 34.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.5%.

GS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported a gross profit of 13.35B and revenue of 30.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.3%.

CMWAY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Commonwealth Bank of Australia PK reported an operating income of 7.62B and revenue of 34.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.3%.

GS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.63B and revenue of 30.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.1%.

CMWAY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Commonwealth Bank of Australia PK reported a net income of 4.89B and revenue of 34.13B, resulting in a net margin of 14.3%.

GS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. reported a net income of 4.62B and revenue of 30.13B, resulting in a net margin of 15.3%.