PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMU.L vs. MVEU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMU.L vs. MVEU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (MVEU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CMU.L is traded in GBp, while MVEU.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the MVEU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMU.L achieves a 19.10% return, which is significantly higher than MVEU.L's 6.38% return. Over the past 10 years, CMU.L has outperformed MVEU.L with an annualized return of 11.62%, while MVEU.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.04% annualized return.


CMU.L

1D
0.44%
1M
3.64%
YTD
19.10%
6M
19.85%
1Y
34.69%
3Y*
17.72%
5Y*
10.96%
10Y*
11.62%

MVEU.L

1D
0.26%
1M
0.18%
YTD
6.38%
6M
6.68%
1Y
11.85%
3Y*
11.79%
5Y*
7.21%
10Y*
8.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMU.L vs. MVEU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMU.L
Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select
19.10%25.71%1.42%14.39%-5.30%13.03%4.59%19.05%-11.56%17.21%
MVEU.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
6.38%17.63%6.71%8.45%-8.16%14.46%1.57%15.47%-2.87%14.16%

Correlation

The correlation between CMU.L and MVEU.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.66

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2012

0.77

The correlation between CMU.L and MVEU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CMU.L vs. MVEU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CMU.L
MVEU.L

Technology

30.9%
3.4%

Financial Services

21.7%
17.6%

Industrials

15.8%
15.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.2%
3.6%

Utilities

5.7%
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
14.1%

Healthcare

4.3%
12.3%

Basic Materials

2.9%
5.1%

Communication Services

2.2%
9.0%

Real Estate

1.3%
1.5%

Energy

0.0%
6.9%

Technology

CMU.L
30.9%
MVEU.L
3.4%

Financial Services

CMU.L
21.7%
MVEU.L
17.6%

Industrials

CMU.L
15.8%
MVEU.L
15.6%

Consumer Cyclical

CMU.L
10.2%
MVEU.L
3.6%

Utilities

CMU.L
5.7%
MVEU.L
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

CMU.L
5.1%
MVEU.L
14.1%

Healthcare

CMU.L
4.3%
MVEU.L
12.3%

Basic Materials

CMU.L
2.9%
MVEU.L
5.1%

Communication Services

CMU.L
2.2%
MVEU.L
9.0%

Real Estate

CMU.L
1.3%
MVEU.L
1.5%

Energy

CMU.L
0.0%
MVEU.L
6.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMU.L vs. MVEU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMU.L
CMU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
CMU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
CMU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

MVEU.L
MVEU.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
MVEU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MVEU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
MVEU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
MVEU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
MVEU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMU.L vs. MVEU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) and iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (MVEU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CMU.LMVEU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.00

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.41

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.24

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

1.42

+1.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.42

4.19

+7.23

CMU.L vs. MVEU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is higher than the MVEU.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMU.L and MVEU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CMU.L vs. MVEU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMU.L drawdown since its inception was -31.46%, which is greater than MVEU.L's maximum drawdown of -23.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMU.L and MVEU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMU.LMVEU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.46%

-23.74%

-7.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.43%

-8.32%

-3.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.95%

-8.32%

-3.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.11%

-17.42%

-3.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.41%

-23.74%

-7.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-3.10%

+2.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.63%

-3.52%

-3.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

2.82%

+0.21%

Volatility

CMU.L vs. MVEU.L - Volatility Comparison

Amundi ETF MSCI EMU ESG Leaders Select (CMU.L) has a higher volatility of 3.23% compared to iShares Edge MSCI Europe Minimum Volatility UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (MVEU.L) at 1.93%. This indicates that CMU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MVEU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMU.LMVEU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

1.93%

+1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.60%

7.32%

+5.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.88%

8.92%

+5.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.00%

11.28%

+4.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.70%

12.62%

+4.08%

CMU.L vs. MVEU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMU.L has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than MVEU.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CMU.L vs. MVEU.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CMU.L nor MVEU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CMU.L and MVEU.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CMU.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CMU.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for MVEU.L.

CMU.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR, while MVEU.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CMU.L and 0.25% for MVEU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMU.L and MVEU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer