PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMTFX vs. VITAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMTFX vs. VITAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX) and Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund Admiral Shares (VITAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CMTFX having a 32.19% return and VITAX slightly higher at 33.66%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CMTFX having a 25.04% annualized return and VITAX not far ahead at 25.97%.


CMTFX

1D
1.47%
1M
17.02%
YTD
32.19%
6M
31.32%
1Y
62.23%
3Y*
36.42%
5Y*
21.26%
10Y*
25.04%

VITAX

1D
1.27%
1M
19.87%
YTD
33.66%
6M
32.51%
1Y
62.61%
3Y*
34.15%
5Y*
23.05%
10Y*
25.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMTFX vs. VITAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMTFX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund
32.19%25.10%31.72%56.85%-34.63%23.04%49.65%44.21%-1.26%43.38%
VITAX
Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund Admiral Shares
33.66%21.78%29.26%52.69%-29.67%30.36%45.93%48.72%2.51%37.07%

Correlation

The correlation between CMTFX and VITAX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2004

0.96

The correlation between CMTFX and VITAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMTFX vs. VITAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMTFX
CMTFX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
CMTFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMTFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMTFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
CMTFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMTFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

VITAX
VITAX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
VITAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VITAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VITAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VITAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
VITAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMTFX vs. VITAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX) and Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund Admiral Shares (VITAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMTFXVITAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.51

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.49

4.00

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.81

12.75

+4.06

CMTFX vs. VITAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMTFX Sharpe Ratio is 3.06, which is comparable to the VITAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMTFX and VITAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMTFXVITAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.06

3.18

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

0.91

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.01

1.05

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.67

-0.17

Drawdowns

CMTFX vs. VITAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMTFX drawdown since its inception was -68.28%, which is greater than VITAX's maximum drawdown of -54.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMTFX and VITAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMTFXVITAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.28%

-54.81%

-13.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.35%

-16.38%

+2.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.63%

-27.38%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.42%

-35.10%

-4.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.42%

-35.10%

-4.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.29%

-8.02%

-8.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.82%

5.13%

-1.31%

Volatility

CMTFX vs. VITAX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX) has a higher volatility of 6.37% compared to Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund Admiral Shares (VITAX) at 6.01%. This indicates that CMTFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VITAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMTFXVITAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.37%

6.01%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.72%

16.09%

+0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.06%

20.61%

+0.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.98%

25.39%

+0.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.84%

24.84%

0.00%

CMTFX vs. VITAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMTFX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than VITAX's 0.09% expense ratio.


Dividends

CMTFX vs. VITAX - Dividend Comparison

CMTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, more than VITAX's 0.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMTFX
Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund
2.34%3.09%1.02%2.23%3.36%4.19%0.87%2.44%5.89%3.60%0.35%1.74%
VITAX
Vanguard Information Technology Index Fund Admiral Shares
0.30%0.40%0.60%0.65%0.91%0.63%0.82%1.11%1.29%0.99%1.31%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, CMTFX and VITAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CMTFX has higher volatility (6.37%) compared to VITAX (6.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMTFX dropped -68.28% vs VITAX's -54.81%.

VITAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 3.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMTFX and VITAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer