CMTFX vs. SPLB
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX) and SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPLB).
CMTFX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Nov 8, 2000. SPLB is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Barclays Long U.S. Corporate Index. It was launched on Mar 10, 2009.
Performance
CMTFX vs. SPLB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CMTFX vs. SPLB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMTFX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund | -10.17% | 25.10% | 31.72% | 56.85% | -34.63% | 23.04% | 49.65% | 44.21% | -1.26% | 43.38% |
SPLB SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF | -0.71% | 7.05% | -1.74% | 11.20% | -25.68% | -1.99% | 13.47% | 23.49% | -7.35% | 12.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMTFX achieves a -10.17% return, which is significantly lower than SPLB's -0.71% return. Over the past 10 years, CMTFX has outperformed SPLB with an annualized return of 20.54%, while SPLB has yielded a comparatively lower 2.39% annualized return.
CMTFX
- 1D
- -1.69%
- 1M
- -9.74%
- YTD
- -10.17%
- 6M
- -8.43%
- 1Y
- 28.08%
- 3Y*
- 24.15%
- 5Y*
- 12.80%
- 10Y*
- 20.54%
SPLB
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- -3.01%
- YTD
- -0.71%
- 6M
- -1.36%
- 1Y
- 3.79%
- 3Y*
- 3.08%
- 5Y*
- -1.80%
- 10Y*
- 2.39%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CMTFX vs. SPLB - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMTFX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than SPLB's 0.07% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CMTFX vs. SPLB — Risk / Return Rank
CMTFX
SPLB
CMTFX vs. SPLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX) and SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMTFX | SPLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 0.38 | +0.66 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.58 | 0.57 | +1.02 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.08 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.70 | 0.78 | +0.92 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.04 | 1.80 | +4.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMTFX | SPLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 0.38 | +0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | -0.14 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 | 0.19 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.44 | 0.00 |
Correlation
The correlation between CMTFX and SPLB is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
CMTFX vs. SPLB - Dividend Comparison
CMTFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, less than SPLB's 5.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMTFX Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund | 3.44% | 3.09% | 1.02% | 2.23% | 3.36% | 4.19% | 0.87% | 2.44% | 5.89% | 3.60% | 0.35% | 1.74% |
SPLB SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF | 5.37% | 5.25% | 5.20% | 4.60% | 4.53% | 3.00% | 3.01% | 3.79% | 4.50% | 4.06% | 4.34% | 4.70% |
Drawdowns
CMTFX vs. SPLB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMTFX drawdown since its inception was -68.28%, which is greater than SPLB's maximum drawdown of -34.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMTFX and SPLB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMTFX | SPLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.28% | -34.46% | -33.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.35% | -5.43% | -8.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -39.42% | -34.46% | -4.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.42% | -34.46% | -4.96% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.35% | -15.92% | +1.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.40% | -7.93% | -8.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | 2.36% | +1.68% |
Volatility
CMTFX vs. SPLB - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Global Technology Growth Fund (CMTFX) has a higher volatility of 7.45% compared to SPDR Portfolio Long Term Corporate Bond ETF (SPLB) at 4.02%. This indicates that CMTFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CMTFX | SPLB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.45% | 4.02% | +3.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.24% | 5.67% | +10.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.01% | 10.14% | +16.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.81% | 12.74% | +13.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.66% | 12.95% | +11.71% |