CMSCX vs. SHGTX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CMSCX (Columbia Small Cap Growth Fund) and SHGTX (Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund) are both mutual funds - CMSCX is a Small Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Columbia, while SHGTX is a Technology Equities fund managed by Columbia. Over the past 10 years, CMSCX returned 17.37%/yr vs 27.87%/yr for SHGTX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CMSCX charges 0.96%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for SHGTX.

Performance

CMSCX vs. SHGTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Small Cap Growth Fund (CMSCX) and Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund (SHGTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMSCX achieves a 25.06% return, which is significantly lower than SHGTX's 58.37% return. Over the past 10 years, CMSCX has underperformed SHGTX with an annualized return of 17.37%, while SHGTX has yielded a comparatively higher 27.87% annualized return.

CMSCX

• 1D: 1.87%
• 1M: 10.84%
• YTD: 25.06%
• 6M: 22.98%
• 1Y: 58.39%
• 3Y*: 27.58%
• 5Y*: 7.79%
• 10Y*: 17.37%

SHGTX

• 1D: 3.58%
• 1M: 16.12%
• YTD: 58.37%
• 6M: 55.67%
• 1Y: 121.45%
• 3Y*: 46.55%
• 5Y*: 26.25%
• 10Y*: 27.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMSCX vs. SHGTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CMSCX Columbia Small Cap Growth Fund	25.06%	21.68%	24.27%	26.17%	-36.62%	-2.22%	70.31%	40.98%	-1.99%	28.68%
SHGTX Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund	58.37%	35.09%	26.04%	45.28%	-31.70%	38.60%	45.56%	54.92%	-8.70%	34.52%

Correlation

The correlation between CMSCX and SHGTX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.81
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 1996	0.82

The correlation between CMSCX and SHGTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CMSCX vs. SHGTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMSCX

CMSCX Risk / Return Rank: 67
CMSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
CMSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
CMSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 52
CMSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
CMSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

SHGTX

SHGTX Risk / Return Rank: 97
SHGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
SHGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
SHGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
SHGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
SHGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMSCX vs. SHGTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Small Cap Growth Fund (CMSCX) and Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund (SHGTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CMSCX	SHGTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.49	4.85	-2.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	5.10	-1.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.69	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.47	10.16	-6.69
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.27	38.70	-24.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CMSCX vs. SHGTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMSCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is lower than the SHGTX Sharpe Ratio of 4.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMSCX and SHGTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CMSCX	SHGTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.49	4.85	-2.37
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.29	0.96	-0.67
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67	1.04	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.52	0.66	-0.14

Drawdowns

CMSCX vs. SHGTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMSCX drawdown since its inception was -55.64%, smaller than the maximum SHGTX drawdown of -77.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMSCX and SHGTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMSCX	SHGTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.64%	-77.47%	+21.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.60%	-12.45%	-5.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.41%	-28.90%	+0.49%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.84%	-43.17%	-6.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-52.44%	-43.17%	-9.27%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.95%	-24.94%	+8.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.26%	3.26%	+1.00%

Volatility

CMSCX vs. SHGTX - Volatility Comparison

Columbia Small Cap Growth Fund (CMSCX) has a higher volatility of 7.92% compared to Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund (SHGTX) at 7.24%. This indicates that CMSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHGTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CMSCX	SHGTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.92%	7.24%	+0.68%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.18%	20.14%	-0.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.52%	26.07%	-1.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.07%	27.43%	-0.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.91%	26.79%	-0.88%

CMSCX vs. SHGTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMSCX has a 0.96% expense ratio, which is lower than SHGTX's 1.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

CMSCX vs. SHGTX - Dividend Comparison

CMSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, less than SHGTX's 5.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMSCX Columbia Small Cap Growth Fund	3.94%	4.93%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	10.28%	6.90%	8.86%	21.17%	16.48%	8.67%	60.38%
SHGTX Columbia Seligman Global Technology Fund	5.33%	8.45%	14.04%	6.22%	3.94%	11.77%	9.92%	10.26%	12.75%	7.25%	8.13%	8.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CMSCX and SHGTX in my portfolio?

CMSCX and SHGTX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CMSCX or SHGTX?

CMSCX has higher volatility (7.92%) compared to SHGTX (7.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMSCX dropped -55.64% vs SHGTX's -77.47%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SHGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.85 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.