PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMP vs. NB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CMP vs. NB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Compass Minerals International, Inc. (CMP) and NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMP achieves a 66.19% return, which is significantly higher than NB's 9.43% return.


CMP

1D
-2.04%
1M
28.25%
YTD
66.19%
6M
65.02%
1Y
69.65%
3Y*
-0.87%
5Y*
-12.63%
10Y*
-5.74%

NB

1D
-7.94%
1M
-3.97%
YTD
9.43%
6M
-4.45%
1Y
131.08%
3Y*
3.31%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMP vs. NB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CMP
Compass Minerals International, Inc.
66.19%74.58%-55.26%-21.55%
NB
NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock
9.43%241.94%-51.41%-57.86%

Correlation

The correlation between CMP and NB is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2023

0.19

The correlation between CMP and NB shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CMP:

$1.38B

NB:

$789.67M

EPS

CMP:

$0.17

NB:

-$0.52

PB Ratio

CMP:

5.03

NB:

1.81

Total Revenue (TTM)

CMP:

$1.29B

NB:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

CMP:

$225.80M

NB:

-$1.00K

EBITDA (TTM)

CMP:

$147.00M

NB:

-$54.65M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMP vs. NB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMP
CMP Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
CMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMP Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
CMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMP Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

NB
NB Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
NB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
NB Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
NB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
NB Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMP vs. NB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Compass Minerals International, Inc. (CMP) and NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMPNBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.24

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.66

2.06

+0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.66

3.27

+2.39

CMP vs. NB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMP Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the NB Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMP and NB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMPNBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43

1.22

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

-0.09

+0.27

Drawdowns

CMP vs. NB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMP drawdown since its inception was -89.12%, which is greater than NB's maximum drawdown of -82.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMP and NB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMPNBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.12%

-82.83%

-6.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-26.29%

-64.10%

+37.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-79.73%

-75.24%

-4.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-89.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.29%

-50.30%

-3.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.77%

-56.03%

+31.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.35%

40.29%

-27.94%

Volatility

CMP vs. NB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Compass Minerals International, Inc. (CMP) is 12.43%, while NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB) has a volatility of 23.10%. This indicates that CMP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMPNBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.43%

23.10%

-10.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

40.65%

66.04%

-25.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.00%

108.29%

-59.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.49%

91.71%

-39.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.89%

91.71%

-46.82%

Dividends

CMP vs. NB - Dividend Comparison

Neither CMP nor NB has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMP
Compass Minerals International, Inc.
0.00%0.00%1.33%2.37%1.46%4.52%4.67%4.72%6.91%3.99%3.55%3.51%
NB
NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CMP vs. NB - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Compass Minerals International, Inc. and NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


-200.00M0.00200.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
453.20M
0
(CMP) Total Revenue
(NB) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CMP and NB have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NB has higher volatility (23.10%) compared to CMP (12.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMP dropped -89.12% vs NB's -82.83%.

CMP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMP and NB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer