CMP vs. NB
CMP (Compass Minerals International, Inc.) and NB (NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock) are both stocks. Both operate in the Other Industrial Metals & Mining industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 3 years, CMP returned -0.87%/yr vs 3.31%/yr for NB. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CMP vs. NB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMP achieves a 66.19% return, which is significantly higher than NB's 9.43% return.
CMP
- 1D
- -2.04%
- 1M
- 28.25%
- YTD
- 66.19%
- 6M
- 65.02%
- 1Y
- 69.65%
- 3Y*
- -0.87%
- 5Y*
- -12.63%
- 10Y*
- -5.74%
NB
- 1D
- -7.94%
- 1M
- -3.97%
- YTD
- 9.43%
- 6M
- -4.45%
- 1Y
- 131.08%
- 3Y*
- 3.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CMP vs. NB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CMP Compass Minerals International, Inc. | 66.19% | 74.58% | -55.26% | -21.55% |
NB NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock | 9.43% | 241.94% | -51.41% | -57.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMP and NB is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 22, 2023 | 0.19 |
The correlation between CMP and NB shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (all time) to 0.38 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CMP:
$1.38B
NB:
$789.67M
CMP:
$0.17
NB:
-$0.52
CMP:
5.03
NB:
1.81
CMP:
$1.29B
NB:
$0.00
CMP:
$225.80M
NB:
-$1.00K
CMP:
$147.00M
NB:
-$54.65M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMP vs. NB — Risk / Return Rank
CMP
NB
CMP vs. NB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Compass Minerals International, Inc. (CMP) and NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMP | NB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.24 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 2.06 | +0.61 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.66 | 3.27 | +2.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMP | NB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.43 | 1.22 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.13 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | -0.09 | +0.27 |
Drawdowns
CMP vs. NB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMP drawdown since its inception was -89.12%, which is greater than NB's maximum drawdown of -82.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMP and NB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMP | NB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -89.12% | -82.83% | -6.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.29% | -64.10% | +37.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -79.73% | -75.24% | -4.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -89.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -54.29% | -50.30% | -3.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.77% | -56.03% | +31.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.35% | 40.29% | -27.94% |
Volatility
CMP vs. NB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Compass Minerals International, Inc. (CMP) is 12.43%, while NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB) has a volatility of 23.10%. This indicates that CMP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMP | NB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.43% | 23.10% | -10.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.65% | 66.04% | -25.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.00% | 108.29% | -59.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.49% | 91.71% | -39.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.89% | 91.71% | -46.82% |
Dividends
CMP vs. NB - Dividend Comparison
Neither CMP nor NB has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMP Compass Minerals International, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.33% | 2.37% | 1.46% | 4.52% | 4.67% | 4.72% | 6.91% | 3.99% | 3.55% | 3.51% |
NB NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
CMP vs. NB - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Compass Minerals International, Inc. and NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CMP and NB have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NB has higher volatility (23.10%) compared to CMP (12.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMP dropped -89.12% vs NB's -82.83%.
CMP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CMP and NB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer