CMP vs. NB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Compass Minerals International, Inc. (CMP) and NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB).

Performance

CMP vs. NB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Compass Minerals International, Inc. (CMP) and NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CMP vs. NB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
CMP Compass Minerals International, Inc.	18.89%	74.58%	-55.26%	-21.55%
NB NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock	-15.85%	241.94%	-51.41%	-57.86%

Fundamentals

Market Cap CMP : $986.93M NB : $521.03M
EPS CMP : -$0.89 NB : -$0.69
PB Ratio CMP : 3.79 NB : 1.69
Total Revenue (TTM) CMP : $1.33B NB : $0.00
Gross Profit (TTM) CMP : $219.60M NB : -$1.00K
EBITDA (TTM) CMP : $149.10M NB : -$58.87M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMP achieves a 18.89% return, which is significantly higher than NB's -15.85% return.

CMP

• 1D: 2.73%
• 1M: -7.34%
• YTD: 18.89%
• 6M: 21.61%
• 1Y: 151.35%
• 3Y*: -11.36%
• 5Y*: -17.22%
• 10Y*: -7.75%

NB

• 1D: 6.44%
• 1M: -15.85%
• YTD: -15.85%
• 6M: -33.23%
• 1Y: 126.40%
• 3Y*: -11.16%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CMP vs. NB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMP

CMP Risk / Return Rank: 93
CMP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
CMP Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
CMP Omega Ratio Rank: 93
CMP Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
CMP Martin Ratio Rank: 91

NB

NB Risk / Return Rank: 75
NB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
NB Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
NB Omega Ratio Rank: 75
NB Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
NB Martin Ratio Rank: 68

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMP vs. NB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Compass Minerals International, Inc. (CMP) and NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CMP	NB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.82	1.10	+1.72
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.25	2.02	+1.23
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.25	+0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.49	1.80	+3.69
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.82	3.09	+8.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CMP vs. NB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMP Sharpe Ratio is 2.82, which is higher than the NB Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMP and NB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CMP	NB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.82	1.10	+1.72
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.33	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.17	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.14	-0.18	+0.32

Correlation

The correlation between CMP and NB is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CMP vs. NB - Dividend Comparison

Neither CMP nor NB has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMP Compass Minerals International, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	1.33%	2.37%	1.46%	4.52%	4.67%	4.72%	6.91%	3.99%	3.55%	3.51%
NB NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

CMP vs. NB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMP drawdown since its inception was -89.12%, which is greater than NB's maximum drawdown of -82.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMP and NB.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMP	NB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.12%	-82.83%	-6.29%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-26.29%	-64.10%	+37.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-89.12%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-89.12%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-67.30%	-61.78%	-5.52%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.49%	-56.29%	+31.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.21%	37.31%	-25.10%

Volatility

CMP vs. NB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Compass Minerals International, Inc. (CMP) is 13.18%, while NioCorp Developments Ltd. Common Stock (NB) has a volatility of 19.72%. This indicates that CMP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CMP	NB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.18%	19.72%	-6.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	39.72%	78.03%	-38.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	54.05%	115.82%	-61.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	51.80%	91.94%	-40.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.46%	91.94%	-47.48%

Financials