PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMNWX vs. VSMPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMNWX vs. VSMPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VSMPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMNWX achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly lower than VSMPX's 11.14% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CMNWX having a 15.46% annualized return and VSMPX not far behind at 15.05%.


CMNWX

1D
-0.79%
1M
3.60%
YTD
9.93%
6M
9.13%
1Y
24.41%
3Y*
23.09%
5Y*
14.51%
10Y*
15.46%

VSMPX

1D
-0.76%
1M
4.07%
YTD
11.14%
6M
10.87%
1Y
28.12%
3Y*
22.06%
5Y*
12.70%
10Y*
15.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMNWX vs. VSMPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMNWX
Principal Capital Appreciation Fund
9.93%13.27%32.14%25.01%-16.37%27.45%18.36%32.21%-4.12%20.64%
VSMPX
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
11.14%17.15%23.26%26.53%-19.50%25.74%21.01%30.79%-5.16%21.19%

Correlation

The correlation between CMNWX and VSMPX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.97

The correlation between CMNWX and VSMPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMNWX vs. VSMPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMNWX
CMNWX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
CMNWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMNWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMNWX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
CMNWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMNWX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

VSMPX
VSMPX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VSMPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSMPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSMPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VSMPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSMPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMNWX vs. VSMPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VSMPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMNWXVSMPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.42

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

3.17

-0.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.86

14.62

-1.76

CMNWX vs. VSMPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMNWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the VSMPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMNWX and VSMPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMNWXVSMPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

2.32

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.74

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

0.82

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.82

-0.11

Drawdowns

CMNWX vs. VSMPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMNWX drawdown since its inception was -50.43%, which is greater than VSMPX's maximum drawdown of -34.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMNWX and VSMPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMNWXVSMPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.43%

-34.97%

-15.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.91%

-8.92%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.54%

-19.36%

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.35%

-25.35%

+2.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.26%

-34.97%

+1.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-0.76%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.95%

-4.59%

-2.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

1.93%

-0.03%

Volatility

CMNWX vs. VSMPX - Volatility Comparison

Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX) and Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VSMPX) have volatilities of 3.00% and 3.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMNWXVSMPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

3.05%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.43%

9.20%

+0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.40%

12.22%

+0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.80%

17.36%

-0.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.19%

18.41%

-1.22%

CMNWX vs. VSMPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMNWX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than VSMPX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

CMNWX vs. VSMPX - Dividend Comparison

CMNWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.96%, more than VSMPX's 1.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMNWX
Principal Capital Appreciation Fund
7.96%8.75%10.03%0.71%0.69%9.52%5.33%8.37%46.60%7.72%10.32%5.42%
VSMPX
Vanguard Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
1.02%1.13%1.27%1.43%1.67%1.22%1.43%1.78%2.05%1.73%1.95%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, CMNWX and VSMPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VSMPX has higher volatility (3.05%) compared to CMNWX (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMNWX dropped -50.43% vs VSMPX's -34.97%.

VSMPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMNWX and VSMPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer