PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMNWX vs. PSSMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMNWX vs. PSSMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX) and Principal SmallCap S&P 600 Index Fund (PSSMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMNWX achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly lower than PSSMX's 14.99% return. Over the past 10 years, CMNWX has outperformed PSSMX with an annualized return of 15.46%, while PSSMX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.73% annualized return.


CMNWX

1D
-0.79%
1M
3.60%
YTD
9.93%
6M
9.13%
1Y
24.41%
3Y*
23.09%
5Y*
14.51%
10Y*
15.46%

PSSMX

1D
-0.85%
1M
0.17%
YTD
14.99%
6M
13.97%
1Y
31.04%
3Y*
16.63%
5Y*
6.58%
10Y*
10.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMNWX vs. PSSMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMNWX
Principal Capital Appreciation Fund
9.93%13.27%32.14%25.01%-16.37%27.45%18.36%32.21%-4.12%20.64%
PSSMX
Principal SmallCap S&P 600 Index Fund
14.99%5.34%16.60%15.18%-16.69%25.39%10.65%21.99%-9.42%12.46%

Correlation

The correlation between CMNWX and PSSMX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

0.87

The correlation between CMNWX and PSSMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMNWX vs. PSSMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMNWX
CMNWX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
CMNWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMNWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMNWX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
CMNWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMNWX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

PSSMX
PSSMX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
PSSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
PSSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMNWX vs. PSSMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX) and Principal SmallCap S&P 600 Index Fund (PSSMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMNWXPSSMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.31

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.75

3.52

-0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.86

11.76

+1.10

CMNWX vs. PSSMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMNWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is comparable to the PSSMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMNWX and PSSMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMNWXPSSMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

1.77

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

0.30

+0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

0.47

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.41

+0.31

Drawdowns

CMNWX vs. PSSMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMNWX drawdown since its inception was -50.43%, smaller than the maximum PSSMX drawdown of -58.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMNWX and PSSMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMNWXPSSMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-50.43%

-58.43%

+8.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.91%

-8.76%

-0.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.54%

-24.30%

+4.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.35%

-27.01%

+3.66%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.26%

-44.85%

+11.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.79%

-0.91%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.95%

-9.52%

+2.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

2.62%

-0.72%

Volatility

CMNWX vs. PSSMX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX) is 3.00%, while Principal SmallCap S&P 600 Index Fund (PSSMX) has a volatility of 4.43%. This indicates that CMNWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSSMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMNWXPSSMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

4.43%

-1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.43%

11.71%

-2.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.40%

17.48%

-5.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.80%

21.76%

-4.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.19%

22.91%

-5.72%

CMNWX vs. PSSMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMNWX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than PSSMX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

CMNWX vs. PSSMX - Dividend Comparison

CMNWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.96%, less than PSSMX's 8.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMNWX
Principal Capital Appreciation Fund
7.96%8.75%10.03%0.71%0.69%9.52%5.33%8.37%46.60%7.72%10.32%5.42%
PSSMX
Principal SmallCap S&P 600 Index Fund
8.68%9.98%15.91%3.75%10.45%8.23%1.67%6.56%13.08%6.03%6.15%8.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMNWX and PSSMX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSSMX has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to CMNWX (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMNWX dropped -50.43% vs PSSMX's -58.43%.

CMNWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMNWX and PSSMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer