CMNWX vs. PHTJX
Compare and contrast key facts about Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2035 Fund (PHTJX).
CMNWX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Nov 24, 1986. PHTJX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Sep 29, 2014.
Performance
CMNWX vs. PHTJX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CMNWX vs. PHTJX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMNWX Principal Capital Appreciation Fund | -6.68% | 13.27% | 32.14% | 25.01% | -16.37% | 27.45% | 18.36% | 32.21% | -4.12% | 20.64% |
PHTJX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2035 Fund | -3.09% | 15.57% | 12.67% | 16.45% | -17.37% | 15.57% | 15.13% | 22.69% | -8.00% | 18.13% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMNWX achieves a -6.68% return, which is significantly lower than PHTJX's -3.09% return. Over the past 10 years, CMNWX has outperformed PHTJX with an annualized return of 13.74%, while PHTJX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.68% annualized return.
CMNWX
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -7.99%
- YTD
- -6.68%
- 6M
- -5.57%
- 1Y
- 12.09%
- 3Y*
- 18.16%
- 5Y*
- 12.23%
- 10Y*
- 13.74%
PHTJX
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -6.23%
- YTD
- -3.09%
- 6M
- -0.84%
- 1Y
- 12.31%
- 3Y*
- 11.60%
- 5Y*
- 6.12%
- 10Y*
- 8.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CMNWX vs. PHTJX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMNWX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than PHTJX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CMNWX vs. PHTJX — Risk / Return Rank
CMNWX
PHTJX
CMNWX vs. PHTJX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2035 Fund (PHTJX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMNWX | PHTJX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.74 | 1.10 | -0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.17 | 1.62 | -0.45 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.23 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | 1.32 | -0.41 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.36 | 6.45 | -2.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMNWX | PHTJX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 1.10 | -0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.52 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 | 0.70 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.63 | +0.05 |
Correlation
The correlation between CMNWX and PHTJX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CMNWX vs. PHTJX - Dividend Comparison
CMNWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.38%, more than PHTJX's 4.83% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMNWX Principal Capital Appreciation Fund | 9.38% | 8.75% | 10.03% | 0.71% | 0.69% | 9.52% | 5.33% | 8.37% | 46.60% | 7.72% | 10.32% | 5.42% |
PHTJX Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2035 Fund | 4.83% | 4.68% | 4.09% | 3.37% | 8.44% | 4.96% | 3.98% | 3.71% | 4.01% | 2.31% | 1.99% | 1.67% |
Drawdowns
CMNWX vs. PHTJX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMNWX drawdown since its inception was -50.43%, which is greater than PHTJX's maximum drawdown of -27.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMNWX and PHTJX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMNWX | PHTJX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.43% | -27.17% | -23.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.50% | -8.63% | -2.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.35% | -23.12% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.26% | -27.17% | -6.09% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.91% | -6.47% | -2.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.99% | -4.24% | -2.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.41% | 1.77% | +0.64% |
Volatility
CMNWX vs. PHTJX - Volatility Comparison
Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX) has a higher volatility of 4.58% compared to Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2035 Fund (PHTJX) at 3.73%. This indicates that CMNWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHTJX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CMNWX | PHTJX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.58% | 3.73% | +0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.55% | 6.47% | +3.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.32% | 11.39% | +5.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.76% | 11.75% | +5.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.14% | 12.47% | +4.67% |