CMNWX vs. PBCKX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

CMNWX (Principal Capital Appreciation Fund) and PBCKX (Principal Blue Chip Fund) are both mutual funds - CMNWX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Principal, while PBCKX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Principal. Over the past 10 years, CMNWX returned 15.53%/yr vs 16.28%/yr for PBCKX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CMNWX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for PBCKX.

Performance

CMNWX vs. PBCKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX) and Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMNWX achieves a 7.21% return, which is significantly higher than PBCKX's -5.65% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CMNWX having a 15.53% annualized return and PBCKX not far ahead at 16.28%.

CMNWX

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: -1.81%
• YTD: 7.21%
• 6M: 5.81%
• 1Y: 19.32%
• 3Y*: 21.49%
• 5Y*: 13.49%
• 10Y*: 15.53%

PBCKX

• 1D: 0.03%
• 1M: -4.95%
• YTD: -5.65%
• 6M: -6.57%
• 1Y: -2.71%
• 3Y*: 15.59%
• 5Y*: 6.39%
• 10Y*: 16.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMNWX vs. PBCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CMNWX Principal Capital Appreciation Fund	7.21%	13.27%	32.14%	25.01%	-16.37%	27.45%	18.36%	32.21%	-4.12%	20.64%
PBCKX Principal Blue Chip Fund	-5.65%	9.20%	26.90%	40.58%	-30.74%	25.05%	34.77%	45.22%	2.83%	28.85%

Correlation

The correlation between CMNWX and PBCKX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.89
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.92
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2012	0.93

The correlation between CMNWX and PBCKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CMNWX vs. PBCKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMNWX

CMNWX Risk / Return Rank: 41
CMNWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
CMNWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
CMNWX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
CMNWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
CMNWX Martin Ratio Rank: 55

PBCKX

PBCKX Risk / Return Rank: 2
PBCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
PBCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
PBCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 2
PBCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
PBCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMNWX vs. PBCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX) and Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CMNWX	PBCKX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.47	-0.20	+1.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.04	-0.16	+2.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	0.98	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.15	-0.16	+2.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.61	-0.47	+10.08

CMNWX vs. PBCKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMNWX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is higher than the PBCKX Sharpe Ratio of -0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMNWX and PBCKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CMNWX vs. PBCKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMNWX drawdown since its inception was -50.43%, which is greater than PBCKX's maximum drawdown of -38.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMNWX and PBCKX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMNWX	PBCKX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-50.43%	-38.00%	-12.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.91%	-19.10%	+10.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.54%	-19.10%	-0.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.35%	-38.00%	+14.65%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.26%	-38.00%	+4.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.24%	-9.23%	+5.99%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.94%	-5.65%	-1.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.99%	6.50%	-4.51%

Volatility

CMNWX vs. PBCKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX) is 5.06%, while Principal Blue Chip Fund (PBCKX) has a volatility of 5.80%. This indicates that CMNWX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CMNWX	PBCKX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.06%	5.80%	-0.74%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.25%	13.04%	-2.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.06%	15.85%	-2.79%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.91%	20.45%	-3.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.21%	20.22%	-3.01%

CMNWX vs. PBCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMNWX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than PBCKX's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

CMNWX vs. PBCKX - Dividend Comparison

CMNWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.16%, less than PBCKX's 21.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMNWX Principal Capital Appreciation Fund	8.16%	8.75%	10.03%	0.71%	0.69%	9.52%	5.33%	8.37%	46.60%	7.72%	10.32%	5.42%
PBCKX Principal Blue Chip Fund	21.14%	19.94%	9.01%	0.51%	0.71%	6.67%	3.28%	8.90%	7.86%	2.79%	1.01%	2.40%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CMNWX and PBCKX in my portfolio?

CMNWX and PBCKX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CMNWX or PBCKX?

PBCKX has higher volatility (5.80%) compared to CMNWX (5.06%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMNWX dropped -50.43% vs PBCKX's -38.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CMNWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.47 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.