CMNVX vs. DMA
CMNVX (Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 45/55 Fund) and DMA (Dimensional Managed Account Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 3 years, CMNVX returned 11.23%/yr vs 19.15%/yr for DMA. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CMNVX charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for DMA.
Performance
CMNVX vs. DMA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMNVX achieves a 5.56% return, which is significantly higher than DMA's -9.21% return.
CMNVX
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 1.70%
- YTD
- 5.56%
- 6M
- 5.81%
- 1Y
- 13.57%
- 3Y*
- 11.23%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DMA
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 3.09%
- YTD
- -9.21%
- 6M
- -5.55%
- 1Y
- -0.01%
- 3Y*
- 19.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CMNVX vs. DMA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMNVX Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 45/55 Fund | 5.56% | 11.29% | 9.60% | 13.32% | -12.87% |
DMA Dimensional Managed Account Fund | -9.21% | 16.89% | 41.06% | -3.81% | -15.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMNVX and DMA is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2022 | 0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMNVX vs. DMA — Risk / Return Rank
CMNVX
DMA
CMNVX vs. DMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 45/55 Fund (CMNVX) and Dimensional Managed Account Fund (DMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMNVX | DMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.01 | +0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.71 | -0.00 | +2.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.95 | -0.00 | +11.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMNVX | DMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.20 | -0.00 | +2.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.18 | +0.50 |
Drawdowns
CMNVX vs. DMA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMNVX drawdown since its inception was -18.25%, smaller than the maximum DMA drawdown of -38.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMNVX and DMA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMNVX | DMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.25% | -38.85% | +20.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.15% | -18.34% | +13.19% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.14% | -18.34% | +10.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.35% | -10.83% | +10.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.97% | -11.31% | +6.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.17% | 6.01% | -4.84% |
Volatility
CMNVX vs. DMA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 45/55 Fund (CMNVX) is 2.04%, while Dimensional Managed Account Fund (DMA) has a volatility of 7.04%. This indicates that CMNVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMNVX | DMA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.04% | 7.04% | -5.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.04% | 12.56% | -7.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.33% | 14.04% | -7.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.25% | 24.29% | -16.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.25% | 24.29% | -16.04% |
CMNVX vs. DMA - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMNVX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than DMA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
CMNVX vs. DMA - Dividend Comparison
CMNVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, less than DMA's 15.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMNVX Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 45/55 Fund | 4.45% | 4.70% | 2.92% | 2.51% | 1.57% | 0.08% |
DMA Dimensional Managed Account Fund | 15.66% | 9.42% | 3.83% | 5.22% | 10.14% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CMNVX and DMA have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DMA has higher volatility (7.04%) compared to CMNVX (2.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMNVX dropped -18.25% vs DMA's -38.85%.
CMNVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs -0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CMNVX and DMA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer