PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMNVX vs. DMA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMNVX vs. DMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 45/55 Fund (CMNVX) and Dimensional Managed Account Fund (DMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMNVX achieves a 5.10% return, which is significantly higher than DMA's -11.18% return.


CMNVX

1D
0.27%
1M
-0.18%
YTD
5.10%
6M
4.61%
1Y
11.79%
3Y*
10.90%
5Y*
10Y*

DMA

1D
0.48%
1M
5.31%
YTD
-11.18%
6M
-11.97%
1Y
-2.22%
3Y*
21.80%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMNVX vs. DMA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CMNVX
Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 45/55 Fund
5.10%11.29%9.60%13.32%-13.30%
DMA
Dimensional Managed Account Fund
-11.18%16.89%41.06%-3.81%-37.55%

Correlation

The correlation between CMNVX and DMA is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2022

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMNVX vs. DMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMNVX
CMNVX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
CMNVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMNVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMNVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
CMNVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMNVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

DMA
DMA Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
DMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
DMA Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
DMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
DMA Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMNVX vs. DMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 45/55 Fund (CMNVX) and Dimensional Managed Account Fund (DMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CMNVXDMADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

0.99

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.29

-0.12

+2.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.89

-0.33

+10.22

CMNVX vs. DMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMNVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is higher than the DMA Sharpe Ratio of -0.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMNVX and DMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CMNVX vs. DMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMNVX drawdown since its inception was -18.25%, smaller than the maximum DMA drawdown of -53.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMNVX and DMA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMNVXDMADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.25%

-53.24%

+34.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.15%

-18.34%

+13.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.14%

-18.34%

+10.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

-12.77%

+11.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.92%

-25.65%

+20.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.19%

6.67%

-5.48%

Volatility

CMNVX vs. DMA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 45/55 Fund (CMNVX) is 2.80%, while Dimensional Managed Account Fund (DMA) has a volatility of 8.19%. This indicates that CMNVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMNVXDMADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.80%

8.19%

-5.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.58%

13.47%

-7.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.75%

15.22%

-8.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.29%

27.22%

-18.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.29%

27.22%

-18.93%

CMNVX vs. DMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMNVX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than DMA's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CMNVX vs. DMA - Dividend Comparison

CMNVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.47%, less than DMA's 16.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CMNVX
Catholic Responsible Investments Magnus 45/55 Fund
4.47%4.70%2.92%2.51%1.57%0.08%
DMA
Dimensional Managed Account Fund
16.66%9.42%3.83%5.22%10.14%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMNVX and DMA have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DMA has higher volatility (8.19%) compared to CMNVX (2.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMNVX dropped -18.25% vs DMA's -53.24%.

CMNVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs -0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMNVX and DMA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer