CMLIX vs. GXXIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Congress Large Cap Growth Fund (CMLIX) and abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX).
CMLIX is managed by Congress. It was launched on Mar 15, 1928. GXXIX is managed by Aberdeen. It was launched on Jun 30, 2000.
Performance
CMLIX vs. GXXIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CMLIX vs. GXXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMLIX Congress Large Cap Growth Fund | -7.74% | 12.70% | 27.69% | 32.36% | -24.47% | 25.63% | 31.54% | 45.96% | 0.19% | 27.01% |
GXXIX abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund | -7.53% | 3.82% | 10.11% | 15.19% | -26.55% | 81.37% | 29.56% | 36.96% | -6.73% | 20.42% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CMLIX having a -7.74% return and GXXIX slightly higher at -7.53%. Over the past 10 years, CMLIX has outperformed GXXIX with an annualized return of 14.90%, while GXXIX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.33% annualized return.
CMLIX
- 1D
- 3.30%
- 1M
- -5.75%
- YTD
- -7.74%
- 6M
- -7.80%
- 1Y
- 10.84%
- 3Y*
- 18.15%
- 5Y*
- 10.16%
- 10Y*
- 14.90%
GXXIX
- 1D
- 2.82%
- 1M
- -5.54%
- YTD
- -7.53%
- 6M
- -7.78%
- 1Y
- 2.72%
- 3Y*
- 5.62%
- 5Y*
- 9.27%
- 10Y*
- 13.33%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CMLIX vs. GXXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMLIX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than GXXIX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CMLIX vs. GXXIX — Risk / Return Rank
CMLIX
GXXIX
CMLIX vs. GXXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Congress Large Cap Growth Fund (CMLIX) and abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMLIX | GXXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.59 | 0.19 | +0.40 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.99 | 0.40 | +0.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.05 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | 0.31 | +0.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.28 | 1.15 | +2.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMLIX | GXXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 | 0.19 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.34 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.56 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.60 | -0.12 |
Correlation
The correlation between CMLIX and GXXIX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CMLIX vs. GXXIX - Dividend Comparison
CMLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.89%, more than GXXIX's 2.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMLIX Congress Large Cap Growth Fund | 7.89% | 7.28% | 11.88% | 3.55% | 4.70% | 10.27% | 8.46% | 14.97% | 6.31% | 1.89% | 1.22% | 3.17% |
GXXIX abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund | 2.48% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.28% | 0.39% | 59.39% | 14.10% | 9.76% | 12.93% | 10.11% | 12.20% | 5.82% |
Drawdowns
CMLIX vs. GXXIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMLIX drawdown since its inception was -30.32%, smaller than the maximum GXXIX drawdown of -33.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMLIX and GXXIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMLIX | GXXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.32% | -33.65% | +3.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.29% | -11.78% | -1.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.32% | -33.65% | +3.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.32% | -33.65% | +3.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.43% | -10.87% | +0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.36% | -6.20% | -1.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.67% | 3.14% | +0.53% |
Volatility
CMLIX vs. GXXIX - Volatility Comparison
Congress Large Cap Growth Fund (CMLIX) has a higher volatility of 6.29% compared to abrdn U.S. Sustainable Leaders Fund (GXXIX) at 5.20%. This indicates that CMLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GXXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CMLIX | GXXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.29% | 5.20% | +1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.60% | 9.27% | +1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.67% | 16.73% | +2.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.00% | 27.78% | -8.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.63% | 23.72% | -3.09% |