PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMJIX vs. CULAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMJIX vs. CULAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund (CMJIX) and Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund (CULAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMJIX achieves a 15.46% return, which is significantly higher than CULAX's 1.34% return. Over the past 10 years, CMJIX has outperformed CULAX with an annualized return of 11.92%, while CULAX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.47% annualized return.


CMJIX

1D
1.33%
1M
6.21%
YTD
15.46%
6M
15.62%
1Y
25.72%
3Y*
16.41%
5Y*
7.39%
10Y*
11.92%

CULAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.31%
YTD
1.34%
6M
1.77%
1Y
4.21%
3Y*
5.11%
5Y*
3.38%
10Y*
2.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMJIX vs. CULAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMJIX
Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund
15.46%9.41%12.53%15.25%-19.10%21.27%24.04%31.03%-9.21%19.13%
CULAX
Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund
1.34%4.55%5.69%6.07%-0.56%0.43%0.66%3.30%1.15%1.27%

Correlation

The correlation between CMJIX and CULAX is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.12

The correlation between CMJIX and CULAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (1 year) to 0.15 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMJIX vs. CULAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMJIX
CMJIX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
CMJIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMJIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMJIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
CMJIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMJIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

CULAX
CULAX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
CULAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CULAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
CULAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
CULAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
CULAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMJIX vs. CULAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund (CMJIX) and Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund (CULAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMJIXCULAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-8.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

4.15

-2.81

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

13.98

-11.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.62

56.95

-45.33

CMJIX vs. CULAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMJIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is lower than the CULAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMJIX and CULAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMJIXCULAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

3.22

-1.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

2.53

-2.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

1.75

-1.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

2.07

-1.45

Drawdowns

CMJIX vs. CULAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMJIX drawdown since its inception was -38.09%, which is greater than CULAX's maximum drawdown of -7.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMJIX and CULAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMJIXCULAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.09%

-7.40%

-30.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.38%

-0.30%

-9.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.46%

-0.30%

-21.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.13%

-2.19%

-25.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.09%

-7.40%

-30.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.24%

-0.21%

-6.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

0.07%

+2.25%

Volatility

CMJIX vs. CULAX - Volatility Comparison

Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund (CMJIX) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund (CULAX) at 0.31%. This indicates that CMJIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CULAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMJIXCULAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

0.31%

+3.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.68%

0.84%

+9.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.07%

1.32%

+12.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.61%

1.35%

+17.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.57%

1.42%

+18.15%

CMJIX vs. CULAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMJIX has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than CULAX's 0.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

CMJIX vs. CULAX - Dividend Comparison

CMJIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, more than CULAX's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMJIX
Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund
3.98%4.59%1.14%1.06%0.99%2.78%2.60%1.85%3.19%2.85%1.99%0.00%
CULAX
Calvert Ultra-Short Duration Income Fund
3.91%4.13%4.90%4.52%1.47%0.64%1.25%2.44%2.10%1.13%1.10%0.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMJIX and CULAX have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CMJIX has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to CULAX (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMJIX dropped -38.09% vs CULAX's -7.40%.

CULAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.22 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMJIX and CULAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer