PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMJIX vs. CISIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMJIX vs. CISIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund (CMJIX) and Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund (CISIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMJIX achieves a 15.46% return, which is significantly higher than CISIX's 13.10% return. Over the past 10 years, CMJIX has underperformed CISIX with an annualized return of 11.92%, while CISIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.63% annualized return.


CMJIX

1D
1.33%
1M
6.21%
YTD
15.46%
6M
15.62%
1Y
25.72%
3Y*
16.41%
5Y*
7.39%
10Y*
11.92%

CISIX

1D
0.24%
1M
6.59%
YTD
13.10%
6M
12.90%
1Y
30.17%
3Y*
22.48%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
15.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMJIX vs. CISIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMJIX
Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund
15.46%9.41%12.53%15.25%-19.10%21.27%24.04%31.03%-9.21%19.13%
CISIX
Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund
13.10%15.90%24.14%27.27%-21.68%25.63%26.12%32.81%-4.08%21.18%

Correlation

The correlation between CMJIX and CISIX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.92

The correlation between CMJIX and CISIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMJIX vs. CISIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMJIX
CMJIX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
CMJIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMJIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMJIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
CMJIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMJIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

CISIX
CISIX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CISIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CISIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
CISIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
CISIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
CISIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMJIX vs. CISIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund (CMJIX) and Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund (CISIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMJIXCISIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.44

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.88

3.21

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.62

14.79

-3.16

CMJIX vs. CISIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMJIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is comparable to the CISIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMJIX and CISIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMJIXCISIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.92

2.50

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.74

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

0.84

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.62

0.39

+0.23

Drawdowns

CMJIX vs. CISIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMJIX drawdown since its inception was -38.09%, smaller than the maximum CISIX drawdown of -59.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMJIX and CISIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMJIXCISIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.09%

-59.36%

+21.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.38%

-9.72%

+0.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.46%

-19.94%

-1.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.13%

-27.37%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.09%

-32.82%

-5.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.24%

-14.29%

+8.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

2.11%

+0.21%

Volatility

CMJIX vs. CISIX - Volatility Comparison

Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund (CMJIX) has a higher volatility of 4.05% compared to Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund (CISIX) at 3.33%. This indicates that CMJIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CISIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMJIXCISIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

3.33%

+0.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.68%

9.66%

+1.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.07%

12.51%

+1.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.61%

17.78%

+0.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.57%

18.57%

+1.00%

CMJIX vs. CISIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CMJIX and CISIX have an expense ratio of 0.24%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CMJIX vs. CISIX - Dividend Comparison

CMJIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, less than CISIX's 4.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CISIX
Calvert US Large-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund
4.77%5.39%1.77%1.02%1.17%1.02%0.94%1.14%4.33%2.41%3.77%7.62%
CMJIX
Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund
3.98%4.59%1.14%1.06%0.99%2.78%2.60%1.85%3.19%2.85%1.99%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMJIX and CISIX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CMJIX has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to CISIX (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMJIX dropped -38.09% vs CISIX's -59.36%.

CISIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMJIX and CISIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer