CMJAX vs. TARKX
Compare and contrast key facts about Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund Class A (CMJAX) and Tarkio Fund (TARKX).
CMJAX is a passively managed fund by Calvert Research and Management that tracks the performance of the Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index. It was launched on Oct 30, 2015. TARKX is managed by Clark Fork Trust. It was launched on Jun 28, 2011.
Performance
CMJAX vs. TARKX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CMJAX vs. TARKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMJAX Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund Class A | -0.02% | 9.14% | 12.24% | 15.00% | -19.32% | 20.96% | 23.72% | 30.67% | -9.50% | 18.70% |
TARKX Tarkio Fund | 3.13% | 30.18% | 21.72% | 26.33% | -30.39% | 24.41% | 27.00% | 29.54% | -23.30% | 29.04% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMJAX achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly lower than TARKX's 3.13% return. Over the past 10 years, CMJAX has underperformed TARKX with an annualized return of 10.35%, while TARKX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.42% annualized return.
CMJAX
- 1D
- 2.84%
- 1M
- -6.25%
- YTD
- -0.02%
- 6M
- 1.32%
- 1Y
- 13.70%
- 3Y*
- 10.50%
- 5Y*
- 4.74%
- 10Y*
- 10.35%
TARKX
- 1D
- 5.32%
- 1M
- -11.53%
- YTD
- 3.13%
- 6M
- 11.85%
- 1Y
- 48.87%
- 3Y*
- 21.76%
- 5Y*
- 7.94%
- 10Y*
- 13.42%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CMJAX vs. TARKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMJAX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than TARKX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CMJAX vs. TARKX — Risk / Return Rank
CMJAX
TARKX
CMJAX vs. TARKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund Class A (CMJAX) and Tarkio Fund (TARKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMJAX | TARKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.74 | 1.55 | -0.80 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.18 | 2.13 | -0.96 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.29 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 2.82 | -1.71 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.81 | 9.30 | -4.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMJAX | TARKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 1.55 | -0.80 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.01 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.03 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.04 | +0.50 |
Correlation
The correlation between CMJAX and TARKX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CMJAX vs. TARKX - Dividend Comparison
CMJAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, less than TARKX's 5.34% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMJAX Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund Class A | 4.41% | 4.40% | 0.89% | 0.84% | 0.80% | 2.64% | 2.43% | 1.57% | 2.97% | 2.81% | 1.86% | 0.00% |
TARKX Tarkio Fund | 5.34% | 5.50% | 1.51% | 2.98% | 10.62% | 1.40% | 0.50% | 5.21% | 3.34% | 1.70% | 0.47% | 0.36% |
Drawdowns
CMJAX vs. TARKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMJAX drawdown since its inception was -38.09%, smaller than the maximum TARKX drawdown of -95.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMJAX and TARKX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMJAX | TARKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.09% | -95.09% | +57.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.05% | -17.33% | +4.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.22% | -95.09% | +66.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.09% | -95.09% | +57.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.82% | -91.33% | +84.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.43% | -17.02% | +10.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 5.25% | -2.23% |
Volatility
CMJAX vs. TARKX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund Class A (CMJAX) is 5.94%, while Tarkio Fund (TARKX) has a volatility of 11.90%. This indicates that CMJAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TARKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CMJAX | TARKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.94% | 11.90% | -5.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.58% | 21.91% | -11.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.98% | 32.25% | -13.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.58% | 600.49% | -581.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.53% | 424.90% | -405.37% |