CMJAX vs. GWSAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund Class A (CMJAX) and Gabelli Focused Growth and Income Fund (GWSAX).
CMJAX is a passively managed fund by Calvert Research and Management that tracks the performance of the Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index. It was launched on Oct 30, 2015. GWSAX is managed by Gabelli. It was launched on Dec 31, 2002.
Performance
CMJAX vs. GWSAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CMJAX vs. GWSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMJAX Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund Class A | -0.02% | 9.14% | 12.24% | 15.00% | -19.32% | 20.96% | 23.72% | 30.67% | -9.50% | 18.70% |
GWSAX Gabelli Focused Growth and Income Fund | 5.40% | 2.11% | 13.19% | 11.90% | -13.71% | 27.12% | 8.69% | 26.78% | -25.30% | 17.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMJAX achieves a -0.02% return, which is significantly lower than GWSAX's 5.40% return. Over the past 10 years, CMJAX has outperformed GWSAX with an annualized return of 10.35%, while GWSAX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.03% annualized return.
CMJAX
- 1D
- 2.84%
- 1M
- -6.25%
- YTD
- -0.02%
- 6M
- 1.32%
- 1Y
- 13.70%
- 3Y*
- 10.50%
- 5Y*
- 4.74%
- 10Y*
- 10.35%
GWSAX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- -3.16%
- YTD
- 5.40%
- 6M
- 5.61%
- 1Y
- 6.01%
- 3Y*
- 10.39%
- 5Y*
- 6.14%
- 10Y*
- 6.03%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CMJAX vs. GWSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMJAX has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than GWSAX's 1.25% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CMJAX vs. GWSAX — Risk / Return Rank
CMJAX
GWSAX
CMJAX vs. GWSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund Class A (CMJAX) and Gabelli Focused Growth and Income Fund (GWSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMJAX | GWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.74 | 0.36 | +0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.18 | 0.56 | +0.62 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.09 | +0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.11 | 0.33 | +0.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.81 | 1.09 | +3.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMJAX | GWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 0.36 | +0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 | 0.40 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | 0.30 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.34 | +0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between CMJAX and GWSAX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CMJAX vs. GWSAX - Dividend Comparison
CMJAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, less than GWSAX's 4.95% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMJAX Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund Class A | 4.41% | 4.40% | 0.89% | 0.84% | 0.80% | 2.64% | 2.43% | 1.57% | 2.97% | 2.81% | 1.86% |
GWSAX Gabelli Focused Growth and Income Fund | 4.95% | 5.11% | 4.39% | 4.57% | 5.00% | 3.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.09% | 0.49% | 1.16% |
Drawdowns
CMJAX vs. GWSAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMJAX drawdown since its inception was -38.09%, smaller than the maximum GWSAX drawdown of -55.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMJAX and GWSAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMJAX | GWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.09% | -55.75% | +17.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.05% | -13.17% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.22% | -18.91% | -9.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.09% | -50.67% | +12.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.82% | -3.37% | -3.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.43% | -9.31% | +2.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 3.94% | -0.92% |
Volatility
CMJAX vs. GWSAX - Volatility Comparison
Calvert US Mid-Cap Core Responsible Index Fund Class A (CMJAX) has a higher volatility of 5.94% compared to Gabelli Focused Growth and Income Fund (GWSAX) at 3.03%. This indicates that CMJAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GWSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CMJAX | GWSAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.94% | 3.03% | +2.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.58% | 7.12% | +3.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.98% | 16.07% | +2.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.58% | 15.43% | +3.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.53% | 20.06% | -0.53% |