CMIEX vs. FAOSX
CMIEX (Multi-Manager International Equity Strategies Fund) and FAOSX (Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, CMIEX returned 8.24%/yr vs 3.61%/yr for FAOSX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CMIEX charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for FAOSX.
Performance
CMIEX vs. FAOSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CMIEX
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- 4.44%
- YTD
- 9.30%
- 6M
- 11.89%
- 1Y
- 22.97%
- 3Y*
- 17.28%
- 5Y*
- 8.24%
- 10Y*
- —
FAOSX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- -2.15%
- 3Y*
- 8.88%
- 5Y*
- 3.61%
- 10Y*
- —
CMIEX vs. FAOSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMIEX Multi-Manager International Equity Strategies Fund | 9.30% | 32.46% | 3.96% | 21.41% | -15.46% | 6.89% | 16.20% | 23.87% | -16.02% |
FAOSX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z | 0.00% | 15.36% | 5.06% | 20.52% | -24.31% | 19.42% | 15.17% | 27.96% | -16.02% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMIEX and FAOSX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 23, 2018 | 0.89 |
Over the past year, the correlation between CMIEX and FAOSX has dropped to 0.58 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMIEX vs. FAOSX — Risk / Return Rank
CMIEX
FAOSX
CMIEX vs. FAOSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Multi-Manager International Equity Strategies Fund (CMIEX) and Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMIEX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 0.97 | +0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.82 | -0.26 | +2.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.76 | -0.44 | +7.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMIEX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | -0.20 | +1.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.22 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.50 | -0.01 |
Drawdowns
CMIEX vs. FAOSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMIEX drawdown since its inception was -35.35%, roughly equal to the maximum FAOSX drawdown of -36.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMIEX and FAOSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMIEX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.35% | -36.24% | +0.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.08% | -7.26% | -5.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.50% | -13.96% | -0.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.43% | -36.24% | +3.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.12% | -5.86% | +4.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.79% | -7.93% | +1.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.52% | 3.98% | -0.46% |
Volatility
CMIEX vs. FAOSX - Volatility Comparison
Multi-Manager International Equity Strategies Fund (CMIEX) has a higher volatility of 5.15% compared to Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z (FAOSX) at 0.00%. This indicates that CMIEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAOSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMIEX | FAOSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.15% | 0.00% | +5.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.03% | 3.98% | +9.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.65% | 9.14% | +6.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.58% | 16.71% | -0.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.36% | 16.68% | +1.68% |
CMIEX vs. FAOSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMIEX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than FAOSX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
CMIEX vs. FAOSX - Dividend Comparison
CMIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.16%, less than FAOSX's 8.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMIEX Multi-Manager International Equity Strategies Fund | 8.16% | 8.92% | 7.54% | 2.26% | 2.44% | 3.21% | 1.30% | 2.47% | 0.83% | 0.00% |
FAOSX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class Z | 8.67% | 8.67% | 1.80% | 1.12% | 0.85% | 2.07% | 0.00% | 1.70% | 5.30% | 3.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CMIEX and FAOSX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CMIEX has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to FAOSX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMIEX dropped -35.35% vs FAOSX's -36.24%.
CMIEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CMIEX and FAOSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer