CMI vs. NVDA
CMI (Cummins Inc.) and NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) are both stocks. CMI operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while NVDA operates in Semiconductors (Technology). Over the past 10 years, CMI returned 22.42%/yr vs 67.95%/yr for NVDA. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CMI vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMI achieves a 30.06% return, which is significantly higher than NVDA's 10.16% return. Over the past 10 years, CMI has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 22.42%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 67.95% annualized return.
CMI
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- -6.75%
- YTD
- 30.06%
- 6M
- 30.16%
- 1Y
- 106.36%
- 3Y*
- 43.37%
- 5Y*
- 24.29%
- 10Y*
- 22.42%
NVDA
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -9.03%
- YTD
- 10.16%
- 6M
- 17.38%
- 1Y
- 41.70%
- 3Y*
- 71.13%
- 5Y*
- 63.13%
- 10Y*
- 67.95%
CMI vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMI Cummins Inc. | 30.06% | 49.36% | 48.92% | 1.72% | 14.09% | -1.68% | 30.50% | 38.04% | -22.06% | 32.74% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 10.16% | 38.92% | 171.25% | 239.02% | -50.26% | 125.48% | 122.30% | 76.94% | -30.82% | 81.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMI and NVDA is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 1999 | 0.34 |
The correlation between CMI and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (3 years) to 0.34 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CMI:
$91.55B
NVDA:
$5.00T
CMI:
$19.27
NVDA:
$6.53
CMI:
34.23
NVDA:
31.44
CMI:
0.38
NVDA:
0.17
CMI:
2.70
NVDA:
19.80
CMI:
7.41
NVDA:
25.60
CMI:
$33.89B
NVDA:
$253.49B
CMI:
$8.60B
NVDA:
$187.95B
CMI:
$4.87B
NVDA:
$192.76B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMI vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank
CMI
NVDA
CMI vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cummins Inc. (CMI) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CMI | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.21 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.03 | 2.07 | +4.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.89 | 4.94 | +19.95 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CMI vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMI drawdown since its inception was -75.66%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -89.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMI and NVDA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMI | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.66% | -89.72% | +14.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.23% | -20.21% | +4.98% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.48% | -36.88% | +6.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.48% | -66.34% | +35.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.05% | -66.34% | +22.29% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.65% | -12.86% | +5.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.22% | -36.18% | +13.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.30% | 8.46% | -4.16% |
Volatility
CMI vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison
Cummins Inc. (CMI) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) have volatilities of 13.69% and 13.26%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMI | NVDA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.69% | 13.26% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.36% | 26.67% | +1.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.70% | 35.00% | -1.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.19% | 51.76% | -23.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.33% | 49.84% | -21.51% |
Dividends
CMI vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison
CMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than NVDA's 0.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMI Cummins Inc. | 1.21% | 1.50% | 2.01% | 2.71% | 2.49% | 2.57% | 2.33% | 2.74% | 3.32% | 2.38% | 2.93% | 3.99% |
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation | 0.14% | 0.02% | 0.03% | 0.03% | 0.11% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.27% | 0.46% | 0.29% | 0.45% | 1.20% |
Financials
CMI vs. NVDA - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cummins Inc. and NVIDIA Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CMI vs. NVDA - Profitability Comparison
CMI - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cummins Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.24B and revenue of 8.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.7%.
NVDA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a gross profit of 61.16B and revenue of 81.62B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.9%.
CMI - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cummins Inc. reported an operating income of 949.00M and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.
NVDA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported an operating income of 53.54B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in an operating margin of 65.6%.
CMI - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cummins Inc. reported a net income of 654.00M and revenue of 8.40B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.
NVDA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, NVIDIA Corporation reported a net income of 58.32B and revenue of 81.62B, resulting in a net margin of 71.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CMI and NVDA have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CMI has higher volatility (13.69%) compared to NVDA (13.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMI dropped -75.66% vs NVDA's -89.72%.
CMI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CMI and NVDA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer