CMGG vs. QUBX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CMGG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF) and QUBX (Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CMGG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for QUBX.

Performance

CMGG vs. QUBX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF (CMGG) and Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMGG achieves a -47.85% return, which is significantly lower than QUBX's -26.52% return.

CMGG

• 1D: -4.79%
• 1M: -25.63%
• YTD: -47.85%
• 6M: -39.20%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QUBX

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: 18.69%
• YTD: -26.52%
• 6M: -61.05%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMGG vs. QUBX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CMGG Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF	-47.85%	43.86%
QUBX Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF	-26.52%	-31.55%

Correlation

The correlation between CMGG and QUBX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025	0.22

Return for Risk

CMGG vs. QUBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF (CMGG) and Tradr 2X Long QUBT Daily ETF (QUBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CMGG	QUBX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.62	-0.44	-0.18

Drawdowns

CMGG vs. QUBX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMGG drawdown since its inception was -56.75%, smaller than the maximum QUBX drawdown of -96.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMGG and QUBX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMGG	QUBX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.75%	-96.40%	+39.65%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.75%	-91.08%	+34.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-21.34%	-69.80%	+48.46%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CMGG	QUBX	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	66.82%	200.33%	-133.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	66.82%	200.33%	-133.51%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	66.82%	200.33%	-133.51%

CMGG vs. QUBX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMGG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than QUBX's 1.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

CMGG vs. QUBX - Dividend Comparison

Neither CMGG nor QUBX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CMGG and QUBX in my portfolio?

CMGG and QUBX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CMGG or QUBX?

On fees, CMGG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CMGG or QUBX?

CMGG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for QUBX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CMGG or QUBX?

CMGG and QUBX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CMGG and QUBX?

They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and Tradr. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CMGG and 1.30% for QUBX.