CMGG vs. PTIR
CMGG (Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF) and PTIR (GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CMGG charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for PTIR.
Performance
CMGG vs. PTIR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CMGG having a -47.85% return and PTIR slightly higher at -46.69%.
CMGG
- 1D
- -4.79%
- 1M
- -25.63%
- YTD
- -47.85%
- 6M
- -39.20%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PTIR
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 4.86%
- YTD
- -46.69%
- 6M
- -47.81%
- 1Y
- -18.36%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CMGG vs. PTIR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CMGG Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF | -47.85% | 43.86% |
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF | -46.69% | 4.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMGG and PTIR is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2025 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMGG vs. PTIR — Risk / Return Rank
CMGG
PTIR
CMGG vs. PTIR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF (CMGG) and GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF (PTIR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMGG | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.18 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.62 | 1.96 | -2.59 |
Drawdowns
CMGG vs. PTIR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMGG drawdown since its inception was -56.75%, smaller than the maximum PTIR drawdown of -69.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMGG and PTIR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMGG | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.75% | -69.10% | +12.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -68.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.75% | -63.26% | +6.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.34% | -27.55% | +6.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 39.74% | — |
Volatility
CMGG vs. PTIR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMGG | PTIR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 33.41% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 77.09% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 66.82% | 103.09% | -36.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 66.82% | 129.44% | -62.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 66.82% | 129.44% | -62.62% |
CMGG vs. PTIR - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMGG has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than PTIR's 1.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
CMGG vs. PTIR - Dividend Comparison
CMGG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PTIR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.90%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CMGG Leverage Shares 2X Long CMG Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PTIR GraniteShares 2x Long PLTR Daily ETF | 10.90% | 5.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CMGG and PTIR have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CMGG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CMGG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.15% for PTIR.
PTIR has the higher dividend yield at 10.90%, compared with 0.00% for CMGG.
They also come from different issuers: Leverage Shares and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for CMGG and 1.15% for PTIR.
Find the right allocation for CMGG and PTIR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer