CMG vs. LIN
CMG (Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.) and LIN (Linde plc) are both stocks. CMG operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical), while LIN operates in Specialty Chemicals (Basic Materials). Over the past 5 years, CMG returned 3.42%/yr vs 14.02%/yr for LIN. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CMG vs. LIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMG achieves a -11.54% return, which is significantly lower than LIN's 23.10% return.
CMG
- 1D
- 1.55%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- -11.54%
- 6M
- -8.93%
- 1Y
- -34.85%
- 3Y*
- -6.98%
- 5Y*
- 3.42%
- 10Y*
- 15.21%
LIN
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 3.36%
- YTD
- 23.10%
- 6M
- 25.88%
- 1Y
- 13.42%
- 3Y*
- 13.03%
- 5Y*
- 14.02%
- 10Y*
- —
CMG vs. LIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMG Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. | -11.54% | -38.64% | 31.83% | 64.83% | -20.64% | 26.07% | 65.65% | 93.87% | -5.00% |
LIN Linde plc | 23.10% | 3.22% | 3.18% | 27.66% | -4.39% | 33.39% | 25.88% | 39.04% | -5.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMG and LIN is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2018 | 0.31 |
The correlation between CMG and LIN shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (1 year) to 0.34 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CMG:
$42.61B
LIN:
$243.18B
CMG:
$1.09
LIN:
$15.16
CMG:
29.93
LIN:
34.40
CMG:
1.12
LIN:
1.72
CMG:
3.58
LIN:
7.07
CMG:
17.70
LIN:
6.31
CMG:
$12.14B
LIN:
$34.66B
CMG:
$4.39B
LIN:
$15.94B
CMG:
$2.30B
LIN:
$12.31B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMG vs. LIN — Risk / Return Rank
CMG
LIN
CMG vs. LIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) and Linde plc (LIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CMG | LIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.69 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 1.14 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.68 | 0.70 | -1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.98 | 1.98 | -2.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CMG vs. LIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMG drawdown since its inception was -74.61%, which is greater than LIN's maximum drawdown of -32.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMG and LIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMG | LIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.61% | -32.59% | -42.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.61% | -19.18% | -32.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -58.89% | -19.18% | -39.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -58.89% | -22.82% | -36.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.89% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -52.26% | -0.40% | -51.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.38% | -5.41% | -15.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 35.51% | 6.78% | +28.73% |
Volatility
CMG vs. LIN - Volatility Comparison
Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. (CMG) has a higher volatility of 10.90% compared to Linde plc (LIN) at 5.58%. This indicates that CMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMG | LIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.90% | 5.58% | +5.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.76% | 13.32% | +10.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.69% | 17.24% | +21.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.60% | 20.80% | +12.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.64% | 24.08% | +11.56% |
Dividends
CMG vs. LIN - Dividend Comparison
CMG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMG Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LIN Linde plc | 1.19% | 1.41% | 1.33% | 1.24% | 1.43% | 1.22% | 1.46% | 1.64% | 0.53% |
Financials
CMG vs. LIN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. and Linde plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CMG vs. LIN - Profitability Comparison
CMG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.11B and revenue of 3.09B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.4%.
LIN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Linde plc reported a gross profit of 4.26B and revenue of 8.78B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.5%.
CMG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. reported an operating income of 397.06M and revenue of 3.09B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.9%.
LIN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Linde plc reported an operating income of 3.26B and revenue of 8.78B, resulting in an operating margin of 37.2%.
CMG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc. reported a net income of 302.82M and revenue of 3.09B, resulting in a net margin of 9.8%.
LIN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Linde plc reported a net income of 1.86B and revenue of 8.78B, resulting in a net margin of 21.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CMG and LIN have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CMG has higher volatility (10.90%) compared to LIN (5.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMG dropped -74.61% vs LIN's -32.59%.
LIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.78 vs -0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CMG and LIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer