CMFP.L vs. PLTR
CMFP.L (L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF) is Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward, while PLTR (Palantir Technologies Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, CMFP.L returned 12.26%/yr vs 41.46%/yr for PLTR. At a correlation of -0.01, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
CMFP.L vs. PLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CMFP.L is traded in GBp, while PLTR is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PLTR values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMFP.L achieves a 14.35% return, which is significantly higher than PLTR's -23.88% return.
CMFP.L
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- -6.61%
- YTD
- 14.35%
- 6M
- 15.89%
- 1Y
- 23.80%
- 3Y*
- 9.26%
- 5Y*
- 12.26%
- 10Y*
- 8.57%
PLTR
- 1D
- 5.18%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- YTD
- -23.88%
- 6M
- -26.69%
- 1Y
- -0.80%
- 3Y*
- 99.19%
- 5Y*
- 41.46%
- 10Y*
- —
CMFP.L vs. PLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMFP.L L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF | 14.35% | 8.49% | 6.86% | -11.43% | 32.79% | 34.61% | 4.79% |
PLTR Palantir Technologies Inc. | -23.88% | 118.28% | 348.17% | 154.08% | -60.55% | -21.94% | 122.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMFP.L and PLTR is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2020 | -0.01 |
The correlation between CMFP.L and PLTR shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (5 years) to 0.08 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMFP.L vs. PLTR — Risk / Return Rank
CMFP.L
PLTR
CMFP.L vs. PLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (CMFP.L) and Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CMFP.L | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.04 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.15 | -0.02 | +3.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.23 | -0.04 | +8.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CMFP.L vs. PLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMFP.L drawdown since its inception was -66.80%, smaller than the maximum PLTR drawdown of -82.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMFP.L and PLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMFP.L | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -66.80% | -82.49% | +15.69% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.53% | -39.88% | +32.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.15% | -41.89% | +16.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.15% | -76.20% | +51.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.06% | -36.31% | +27.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -43.95% | -39.01% | -4.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 22.48% | -19.60% |
Volatility
CMFP.L vs. PLTR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (CMFP.L) is 3.78%, while Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) has a volatility of 17.30%. This indicates that CMFP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMFP.L | PLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.78% | 17.30% | -13.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.33% | 37.66% | -25.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.90% | 50.57% | -35.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.04% | 64.56% | -44.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.84% | 68.99% | -52.15% |
Dividends
CMFP.L vs. PLTR - Dividend Comparison
Neither CMFP.L nor PLTR has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CMFP.L and PLTR have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CMFP.L and PLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer