CMFP.L vs. NVDA

Last updated Jun 16, 2026

CMFP.L (L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF) is Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward, while NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, CMFP.L returned 8.57%/yr vs 69.75%/yr for NVDA. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CMFP.L vs. NVDA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (CMFP.L) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

CMFP.L is traded in GBp, while NVDA is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NVDA values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CMFP.L having a 14.35% return and NVDA slightly higher at 14.56%. Over the past 10 years, CMFP.L has underperformed NVDA with an annualized return of 8.57%, while NVDA has yielded a comparatively higher 69.75% annualized return.

CMFP.L

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: -6.61%
• YTD: 14.35%
• 6M: 15.89%
• 1Y: 23.80%
• 3Y*: 9.26%
• 5Y*: 12.26%
• 10Y*: 8.57%

NVDA

• 1D: 3.47%
• 1M: -6.24%
• YTD: 14.56%
• 6M: 20.32%
• 1Y: 51.61%
• 3Y*: 68.31%
• 5Y*: 65.67%
• 10Y*: 69.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMFP.L vs. NVDA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CMFP.L L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF	14.35%	8.49%	6.86%	-11.43%	32.79%	34.61%	-0.92%	3.99%	-3.16%	-6.17%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	14.56%	29.02%	175.99%	222.07%	-44.35%	127.62%	115.77%	70.21%	-26.71%	66.25%

Correlation

The correlation between CMFP.L and NVDA is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.07
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.04
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.00
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 15, 2010	0.13

The correlation between CMFP.L and NVDA shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (5 years) to 0.13 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CMFP.L vs. NVDA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMFP.L

CMFP.L Risk / Return Rank: 52
CMFP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
CMFP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
CMFP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 48
CMFP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
CMFP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 51

NVDA

NVDA Risk / Return Rank: 78
NVDA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
NVDA Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
NVDA Omega Ratio Rank: 74
NVDA Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
NVDA Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMFP.L vs. NVDA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (CMFP.L) and NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CMFP.L	NVDA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.59	1.48	+0.12
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.10	2.06	+0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.25	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.15	2.54	+0.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.23	5.45	+2.78

CMFP.L vs. NVDA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMFP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is comparable to the NVDA Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMFP.L and NVDA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CMFP.L vs. NVDA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMFP.L drawdown since its inception was -66.80%, smaller than the maximum NVDA drawdown of -79.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMFP.L and NVDA.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMFP.L	NVDA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-66.80%	-79.51%	+12.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.53%	-20.42%	+12.89%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.15%	-39.34%	+14.19%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.15%	-59.90%	+34.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.15%	-59.90%	+34.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.06%	-9.86%	+0.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-43.95%	-28.43%	-15.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.88%	9.50%	-6.62%

Volatility

CMFP.L vs. NVDA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (CMFP.L) is 3.78%, while NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) has a volatility of 12.35%. This indicates that CMFP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVDA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CMFP.L	NVDA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.78%	12.35%	-8.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.33%	26.07%	-13.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.90%	35.20%	-20.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.04%	50.64%	-30.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.84%	49.48%	-32.64%

Dividends

CMFP.L vs. NVDA - Dividend Comparison

CMFP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NVDA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CMFP.L L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
NVDA NVIDIA Corporation	0.13%	0.02%	0.03%	0.03%	0.11%	0.05%	0.12%	0.27%	0.46%	0.29%	0.45%	1.20%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CMFP.L and NVDA in my portfolio?

CMFP.L and NVDA have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.