CMFP.L vs. ERNS.L
CMFP.L (L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF) and ERNS.L (iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - CMFP.L is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity 3 Month Forward, while ERNS.L is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by iShares. CMFP.L is passively managed, while ERNS.L is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, CMFP.L returned 9.22%/yr vs 2.20%/yr for ERNS.L. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CMFP.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for ERNS.L.
Performance
CMFP.L vs. ERNS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CMFP.L is traded in GBp, while ERNS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ERNS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMFP.L achieves a 19.16% return, which is significantly higher than ERNS.L's 1.58% return. Over the past 10 years, CMFP.L has outperformed ERNS.L with an annualized return of 9.22%, while ERNS.L has yielded a comparatively lower 2.20% annualized return.
CMFP.L
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -1.18%
- YTD
- 19.16%
- 6M
- 18.60%
- 1Y
- 32.00%
- 3Y*
- 10.92%
- 5Y*
- 13.29%
- 10Y*
- 9.22%
ERNS.L
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 4.44%
- 3Y*
- 5.11%
- 5Y*
- 3.62%
- 10Y*
- 2.20%
CMFP.L vs. ERNS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMFP.L L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF | 19.16% | 8.49% | 6.86% | -11.43% | 32.79% | 34.61% | -0.92% | 3.99% | -3.16% | -6.17% |
ERNS.L iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) | 1.58% | 4.84% | 5.54% | 4.76% | 1.54% | 0.13% | 0.77% | 1.27% | 0.58% | 0.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMFP.L and ERNS.L is -0.10, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2013 | 0.01 |
The correlation between CMFP.L and ERNS.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMFP.L vs. ERNS.L — Risk / Return Rank
CMFP.L
ERNS.L
CMFP.L vs. ERNS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (CMFP.L) and iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (ERNS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMFP.L | ERNS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 2.39 | -1.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.81 | 20.38 | -15.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.77 | 108.76 | -96.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMFP.L | ERNS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.16 | 5.30 | -3.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | 4.34 | -3.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 2.38 | -1.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 2.23 | -1.96 |
Drawdowns
CMFP.L vs. ERNS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMFP.L drawdown since its inception was -50.47%, which is greater than ERNS.L's maximum drawdown of -1.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMFP.L and ERNS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMFP.L | ERNS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.47% | -1.51% | -48.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.63% | -0.22% | -6.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.97% | -0.22% | -12.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.51% | -0.36% | -23.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.95% | -1.51% | -22.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.64% | 0.00% | -3.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.51% | -0.05% | -24.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.71% | 0.04% | +2.67% |
Volatility
CMFP.L vs. ERNS.L - Volatility Comparison
L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF (CMFP.L) has a higher volatility of 4.82% compared to iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (ERNS.L) at 0.36%. This indicates that CMFP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ERNS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMFP.L | ERNS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.82% | 0.36% | +4.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.18% | 0.68% | +11.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.73% | 0.84% | +13.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.86% | 0.83% | +14.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.92% | 0.92% | +13.00% |
CMFP.L vs. ERNS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMFP.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than ERNS.L's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
CMFP.L vs. ERNS.L - Dividend Comparison
CMFP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ERNS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.65%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMFP.L L&G Longer Dated All Commodities UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ERNS.L iShares £ Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) | 5.65% | 4.65% | 5.42% | 4.54% | 1.14% | 0.28% | 0.75% | 1.04% | 0.74% | 0.52% | 0.81% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CMFP.L and ERNS.L have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ERNS.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ERNS.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for CMFP.L.
CMFP.L is categorized as Commodities, while ERNS.L is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Legal & General and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for CMFP.L and 0.09% for ERNS.L.
Find the right allocation for CMFP.L and ERNS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer