PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMF vs. TAXS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMF vs. TAXS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares California Muni Bond ETF (CMF) and Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMF achieves a -0.17% return, which is significantly lower than TAXS's 0.84% return.


CMF

1D
-0.05%
1M
-1.82%
6M
-0.93%
YTD
-0.17%
1Y
4.37%
3Y*
2.68%
5Y*
0.31%
10Y*
1.55%
ALL TIME*
3.21%

TAXS

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.36%
6M
0.30%
YTD
0.84%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$29.81M$26.50M$27.09M
$619.80K$883.25K$948.95K

CMF vs. TAXS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CMF and TAXS is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 19, 2025

0.67

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMF vs. TAXS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CMF
CMF Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMF Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
CMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMF Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

TAXS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CMF vs. TAXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares California Muni Bond ETF (CMF) and Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (TAXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CMFTAXSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.29

CMF vs. TAXS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CMF vs. TAXS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMF drawdown since its inception was -16.45%, which is greater than TAXS's maximum drawdown of -0.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMF and TAXS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMFTAXSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.45%

-0.84%

-15.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.03%

-0.39%

-1.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.74%

-0.22%

-4.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.95%

Volatility

CMF vs. TAXS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMFTAXSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.86%

1.03%

+1.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.21%

1.03%

+3.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.08%

1.03%

+4.05%

CMF vs. TAXS - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMF has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than TAXS's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CMF vs. TAXS - Dividend Comparison

CMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.99%, more than TAXS's 2.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMF
iShares California Muni Bond ETF
2.74%2.94%2.78%2.29%1.91%1.58%1.80%2.03%2.17%2.09%2.21%2.55%
TAXS
Northern Trust Short-Term Tax-Exempt Bond ETF
2.04%0.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMF and TAXS have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TAXS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TAXS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for CMF.

CMF has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 2.04% for TAXS.

CMF tracks S&P California AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index, while TAXS tracks ICE Short Term Focused Municipal Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for CMF and 0.05% for TAXS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMF and TAXS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer