PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMEUX vs. VFFSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMEUX vs. VFFSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund (CMEUX) and Vanguard 500 Index Fund Institutional Select Shares (VFFSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CMEUX having a 10.84% return and VFFSX slightly higher at 11.35%.


CMEUX

1D
0.41%
1M
1.89%
6M
8.86%
YTD
10.84%
1Y
22.90%
3Y*
21.47%
5Y*
12.65%
10Y*

VFFSX

1D
0.43%
1M
2.02%
6M
9.20%
YTD
11.35%
1Y
22.46%
3Y*
21.10%
5Y*
13.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMEUX vs. VFFSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CMEUX
Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund
10.84%18.38%24.94%29.09%-20.29%26.65%29.12%12.13%
VFFSX
Vanguard 500 Index Fund Institutional Select Shares
11.35%17.87%25.00%26.28%-18.14%29.24%18.35%12.77%

Correlation

The correlation between CMEUX and VFFSX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2019

0.96

The correlation between CMEUX and VFFSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMEUX vs. VFFSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMEUX
CMEUX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
CMEUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMEUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMEUX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CMEUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMEUX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

VFFSX
VFFSX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
VFFSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VFFSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
VFFSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
VFFSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
VFFSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMEUX vs. VFFSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund (CMEUX) and Vanguard 500 Index Fund Institutional Select Shares (VFFSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CMEUXVFFSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.32

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

2.49

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.80

10.93

-1.13

CMEUX vs. VFFSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMEUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the VFFSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMEUX and VFFSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CMEUX vs. VFFSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMEUX drawdown since its inception was -28.39%, smaller than the maximum VFFSX drawdown of -33.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMEUX and VFFSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMEUXVFFSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.39%

-33.82%

+5.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.51%

-8.90%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.91%

-18.75%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.61%

-24.51%

-1.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

-0.32%

-0.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.29%

-4.47%

-0.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

2.02%

+0.30%

Volatility

CMEUX vs. VFFSX - Volatility Comparison

Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund (CMEUX) has a higher volatility of 4.50% compared to Vanguard 500 Index Fund Institutional Select Shares (VFFSX) at 4.26%. This indicates that CMEUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFFSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMEUXVFFSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.50%

4.26%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.28%

9.96%

+0.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.99%

12.52%

+0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.05%

17.00%

+1.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.91%

18.38%

+1.53%

CMEUX vs. VFFSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMEUX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than VFFSX's 0.01% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CMEUX vs. VFFSX - Dividend Comparison

CMEUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than VFFSX's 1.07% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMEUX
Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund
0.91%1.01%1.02%1.16%1.52%4.12%3.33%1.72%0.00%0.00%
VFFSX
Vanguard 500 Index Fund Institutional Select Shares
1.07%1.14%1.24%1.46%1.70%1.61%1.56%2.15%2.09%1.81%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, CMEUX and VFFSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CMEUX has higher volatility (4.50%) compared to VFFSX (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMEUX dropped -28.39% vs VFFSX's -33.82%.

VFFSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMEUX and VFFSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer