PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMEUX vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMEUX vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund (CMEUX) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CMEUX having a 11.21% return and IVV slightly higher at 11.38%.


CMEUX

1D
-0.77%
1M
4.77%
YTD
11.21%
6M
10.79%
1Y
30.02%
3Y*
22.89%
5Y*
13.95%
10Y*

IVV

1D
0.47%
1M
4.66%
YTD
11.38%
6M
11.30%
1Y
28.64%
3Y*
22.69%
5Y*
13.99%
10Y*
15.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMEUX vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CMEUX
Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund
11.21%18.38%24.94%29.09%-20.29%26.65%29.12%12.13%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
11.38%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%12.44%

Correlation

The correlation between CMEUX and IVV is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2019

0.96

The correlation between CMEUX and IVV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMEUX vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMEUX
CMEUX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
CMEUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMEUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMEUX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
CMEUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMEUX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMEUX vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund (CMEUX) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMEUXIVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.44

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.21

3.24

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.16

15.05

-0.89

CMEUX vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMEUX Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMEUX and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMEUXIVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.50

2.44

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.83

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

0.45

+0.41

Drawdowns

CMEUX vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMEUX drawdown since its inception was -28.39%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMEUX and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMEUXIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.39%

-55.25%

+26.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.51%

-8.89%

-0.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.91%

-18.75%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.61%

-24.53%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.77%

-0.29%

-0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.34%

-10.78%

+5.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.15%

1.91%

+0.24%

Volatility

CMEUX vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund (CMEUX) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) have volatilities of 2.92% and 2.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMEUXIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.92%

2.83%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.24%

8.90%

+0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.22%

11.80%

+0.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.94%

16.88%

+1.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.96%

18.05%

+1.91%

CMEUX vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMEUX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

CMEUX vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

CMEUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than IVV's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMEUX
Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund
0.91%1.01%1.02%1.16%1.52%4.12%3.33%1.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.06%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, CMEUX and IVV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

CMEUX has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to IVV (2.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMEUX dropped -28.39% vs IVV's -55.25%.

CMEUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMEUX and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer