PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMEUX vs. BGSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMEUX vs. BGSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund (CMEUX) and BlackRock Technology Opportunities Fund Investor A (BGSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMEUX achieves a 9.35% return, which is significantly lower than BGSAX's 43.67% return.


CMEUX

1D
-0.56%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
9.35%
6M
8.37%
1Y
26.40%
3Y*
21.67%
5Y*
13.11%
10Y*

BGSAX

1D
0.07%
1M
9.19%
YTD
43.67%
6M
42.15%
1Y
65.19%
3Y*
39.96%
5Y*
16.00%
10Y*
26.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMEUX vs. BGSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
CMEUX
Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund
9.35%18.38%24.94%29.09%-20.29%26.65%29.12%12.13%
BGSAX
BlackRock Technology Opportunities Fund Investor A
43.67%19.63%40.56%49.09%-43.13%8.19%86.27%13.74%

Correlation

The correlation between CMEUX and BGSAX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2019

0.86

The correlation between CMEUX and BGSAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMEUX vs. BGSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMEUX
CMEUX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
CMEUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMEUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMEUX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
CMEUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMEUX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

BGSAX
BGSAX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
BGSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
BGSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMEUX vs. BGSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund (CMEUX) and BlackRock Technology Opportunities Fund Investor A (BGSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CMEUXBGSAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.41

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

3.65

-0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.34

10.67

+1.67

CMEUX vs. BGSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMEUX Sharpe Ratio is 2.14, which is comparable to the BGSAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMEUX and BGSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CMEUX vs. BGSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMEUX drawdown since its inception was -28.39%, smaller than the maximum BGSAX drawdown of -73.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMEUX and BGSAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMEUXBGSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.39%

-73.75%

+45.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.51%

-18.49%

+8.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.91%

-27.75%

+7.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.61%

-49.22%

+23.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.43%

-0.22%

-2.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.31%

-26.33%

+21.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.23%

6.32%

-4.09%

Volatility

CMEUX vs. BGSAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund (CMEUX) is 5.09%, while BlackRock Technology Opportunities Fund Investor A (BGSAX) has a volatility of 14.30%. This indicates that CMEUX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMEUXBGSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.09%

14.30%

-9.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.30%

23.64%

-13.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.97%

27.91%

-14.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.05%

28.33%

-10.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.96%

26.20%

-6.24%

CMEUX vs. BGSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMEUX has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than BGSAX's 1.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

CMEUX vs. BGSAX - Dividend Comparison

CMEUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.93%, less than BGSAX's 9.43% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BGSAX
BlackRock Technology Opportunities Fund Investor A
9.43%13.55%8.68%0.00%0.00%7.66%4.86%1.50%1.24%8.01%1.17%
CMEUX
Six Circles Managed Equity Portfolio U.S. Unconstrained Fund
0.93%1.01%1.02%1.16%1.52%4.12%3.33%1.72%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMEUX and BGSAX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BGSAX has higher volatility (14.30%) compared to CMEUX (5.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMEUX dropped -28.39% vs BGSAX's -73.75%.

BGSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.43 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMEUX and BGSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer