CMCSA vs. CHAT
CMCSA (Comcast Corporation) is a stock, while CHAT (Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF) is Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Over the past 3 years, CMCSA returned -9.79%/yr vs 54.00%/yr for CHAT. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CMCSA vs. CHAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMCSA achieves a -9.81% return, which is significantly lower than CHAT's 70.00% return.
CMCSA
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- -11.83%
- YTD
- -9.81%
- 6M
- -0.89%
- 1Y
- -20.17%
- 3Y*
- -9.79%
- 5Y*
- -11.63%
- 10Y*
- 0.66%
CHAT
- 1D
- -2.47%
- 1M
- 21.73%
- YTD
- 70.00%
- 6M
- 67.89%
- 1Y
- 133.72%
- 3Y*
- 54.00%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CMCSA vs. CHAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CMCSA Comcast Corporation | -9.81% | -17.35% | -11.84% | 7.60% |
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 70.00% | 49.85% | 30.98% | 19.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMCSA and CHAT is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2023 | 0.10 |
The correlation between CMCSA and CHAT shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.10 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMCSA vs. CHAT — Risk / Return Rank
CMCSA
CHAT
CMCSA vs. CHAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) and Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMCSA | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.61 | -0.72 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.74 | 8.26 | -9.00 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.46 | 24.36 | -25.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMCSA | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.69 | 4.37 | -5.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 1.93 | -1.66 |
Drawdowns
CMCSA vs. CHAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMCSA drawdown since its inception was -67.89%, which is greater than CHAT's maximum drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMCSA and CHAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMCSA | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.89% | -31.34% | -36.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.34% | -16.28% | -11.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.87% | -31.34% | -8.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -52.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -50.47% | -3.11% | -47.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.61% | -5.35% | -19.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.84% | 5.51% | +8.33% |
Volatility
CMCSA vs. CHAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Comcast Corporation (CMCSA) is 6.87%, while Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF (CHAT) has a volatility of 12.18%. This indicates that CMCSA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CHAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMCSA | CHAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.87% | 12.18% | -5.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.03% | 24.80% | +0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.29% | 30.81% | -1.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.94% | 29.92% | -2.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.48% | 29.92% | -3.44% |
Dividends
CMCSA vs. CHAT - Dividend Comparison
CMCSA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.44%, more than CHAT's 1.68% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CHAT Roundhill Generative AI & Technology ETF | 1.68% | 2.85% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CMCSA Comcast Corporation | 12.44% | 4.35% | 3.25% | 2.60% | 3.03% | 1.95% | 1.72% | 1.40% | 2.69% | 1.18% | 1.96% | 1.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CMCSA and CHAT have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CHAT has higher volatility (12.18%) compared to CMCSA (6.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMCSA dropped -67.89% vs CHAT's -31.34%.
CHAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.37 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CMCSA and CHAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer