PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMCL vs. JNJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CMCL vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (CMCL) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMCL achieves a -21.95% return, which is significantly lower than JNJ's 17.68% return.


CMCL

1D
3.65%
1M
-17.97%
YTD
-21.95%
6M
-20.06%
1Y
3.33%
3Y*
20.06%
5Y*
12.13%
10Y*

JNJ

1D
1.07%
1M
5.14%
YTD
17.68%
6M
15.11%
1Y
57.60%
3Y*
17.82%
5Y*
10.94%
10Y*
10.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMCL vs. JNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMCL
Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc
-21.95%186.75%-18.90%2.65%11.39%-23.84%93.29%67.37%-26.33%20.43%
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
17.68%47.48%-4.81%-8.58%5.97%11.44%10.82%16.22%-5.13%5.72%

Correlation

The correlation between CMCL and JNJ is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2017

0.09

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CMCL:

$399.89M

JNJ:

$588.98B

EPS

CMCL:

$3.15

JNJ:

$8.65

PE Ratio

CMCL:

6.41

JNJ:

27.85

PEG Ratio

CMCL:

0.17

JNJ:

0.93

PS Ratio

CMCL:

1.45

JNJ:

6.08

PB Ratio

CMCL:

1.47

JNJ:

7.25

Total Revenue (TTM)

CMCL:

$274.16M

JNJ:

$96.36B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CMCL:

$142.30M

JNJ:

$66.60B

EBITDA (TTM)

CMCL:

$137.13M

JNJ:

$31.62B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMCL vs. JNJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMCL
CMCL Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
CMCL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMCL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMCL Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
CMCL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMCL Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

JNJ
JNJ Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
JNJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNJ Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
JNJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNJ Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMCL vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (CMCL) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CMCLJNJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.61

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.07

5.28

-5.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.13

15.52

-15.39

CMCL vs. JNJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMCL Sharpe Ratio is 0.05, which is lower than the JNJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMCL and JNJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CMCL vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMCL drawdown since its inception was -65.77%, which is greater than JNJ's maximum drawdown of -50.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMCL and JNJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMCLJNJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.77%

-50.67%

-15.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.43%

-10.96%

-38.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-49.43%

-15.95%

-33.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.00%

-18.41%

-31.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.57%

-2.54%

-43.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.78%

-11.90%

-23.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.12%

3.72%

+21.40%

Volatility

CMCL vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison

Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc (CMCL) has a higher volatility of 14.52% compared to Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) at 5.47%. This indicates that CMCL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMCLJNJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.52%

5.47%

+9.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

47.45%

12.16%

+35.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

65.21%

16.94%

+48.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.74%

16.87%

+35.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

54.57%

18.48%

+36.09%

Dividends

CMCL vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison

CMCL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than JNJ's 2.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMCL
Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc
2.78%2.14%5.95%4.59%4.52%4.29%2.11%3.27%5.23%1.86%0.00%0.00%
JNJ
Johnson & Johnson
2.18%2.48%3.40%3.00%2.52%2.45%2.53%2.57%2.74%2.38%2.73%2.87%

Financials

CMCL vs. JNJ - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc and Johnson & Johnson. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B20222023202420252026
66.43M
24.06B
(CMCL) Total Revenue
(JNJ) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CMCL vs. JNJ - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc and Johnson & Johnson over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20222023202420252026
48.3%
71.5%
Portfolio components
CMCL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc reported a gross profit of 32.10M and revenue of 66.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.3%.

JNJ - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a gross profit of 17.20B and revenue of 24.06B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 71.5%.

CMCL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc reported an operating income of 26.87M and revenue of 66.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 40.4%.

JNJ - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported an operating income of 6.40B and revenue of 24.06B, resulting in an operating margin of 26.6%.

CMCL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Caledonia Mining Corporation Plc reported a net income of 15.85M and revenue of 66.43M, resulting in a net margin of 23.9%.

JNJ - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Johnson & Johnson reported a net income of 5.24B and revenue of 24.06B, resulting in a net margin of 21.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CMCL and JNJ have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CMCL has higher volatility (14.52%) compared to JNJ (5.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMCL dropped -65.77% vs JNJ's -50.67%.

JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.42 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMCL and JNJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer