CMBS vs. JPIB
CMBS (iShares CMBS ETF) and JPIB (JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CMBS is a Mortgage Backed Securities fund tracking the Barclays Capital U.S. CMBS (ERISA Only) Index, while JPIB is a Global Bonds fund actively managed by JPMorgan. CMBS is passively managed, while JPIB is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, CMBS returned 0.70%/yr vs 2.76%/yr for JPIB. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CMBS charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for JPIB.
Performance
CMBS vs. JPIB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMBS achieves a 0.25% return, which is significantly lower than JPIB's 1.10% return.
CMBS
- 1D
- -0.23%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- YTD
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 0.56%
- 1Y
- 4.12%
- 3Y*
- 5.34%
- 5Y*
- 0.70%
- 10Y*
- 2.00%
JPIB
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- 1Y
- 5.24%
- 3Y*
- 5.93%
- 5Y*
- 2.76%
- 10Y*
- —
CMBS vs. JPIB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMBS iShares CMBS ETF | 0.25% | 7.67% | 4.27% | 5.06% | -11.21% | -1.82% | 7.86% | 7.94% | 0.77% | 1.43% |
JPIB JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF | 1.10% | 8.19% | 3.48% | 8.68% | -6.38% | 0.14% | 7.14% | 10.76% | -2.17% | 2.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMBS and JPIB is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2017 | 0.24 |
The correlation between CMBS and JPIB shifts across timeframes, from 0.24 (all time) to 0.47 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMBS vs. JPIB — Risk / Return Rank
CMBS
JPIB
CMBS vs. JPIB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares CMBS ETF (CMBS) and JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF (JPIB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CMBS | JPIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.27 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.67 | 1.29 | +0.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.46 | 4.42 | +0.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CMBS vs. JPIB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMBS drawdown since its inception was -15.87%, which is greater than JPIB's maximum drawdown of -13.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMBS and JPIB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMBS | JPIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.87% | -13.13% | -2.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.44% | -3.75% | +1.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.29% | -3.75% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.87% | -11.83% | -4.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -15.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.67% | -0.77% | -0.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.95% | -1.93% | -1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.91% | 1.09% | -0.18% |
Volatility
CMBS vs. JPIB - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares CMBS ETF (CMBS) is 1.10%, while JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF (JPIB) has a volatility of 1.19%. This indicates that CMBS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JPIB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMBS | JPIB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.10% | 1.19% | -0.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.81% | 3.07% | -0.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.64% | 3.58% | +0.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.31% | 4.12% | +1.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.77% | 4.44% | +1.33% |
CMBS vs. JPIB - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMBS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than JPIB's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
CMBS vs. JPIB - Dividend Comparison
CMBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.58%, less than JPIB's 5.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMBS iShares CMBS ETF | 3.58% | 3.45% | 3.31% | 2.97% | 2.65% | 2.46% | 2.83% | 2.74% | 2.70% | 2.50% | 2.29% | 2.31% |
JPIB JPMorgan International Bond Opportunities ETF | 5.00% | 4.85% | 4.57% | 4.35% | 3.10% | 2.59% | 3.14% | 4.66% | 5.83% | 1.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CMBS and JPIB have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JPIB has higher volatility (1.19%) compared to CMBS (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMBS dropped -15.87% vs JPIB's -13.13%.
On 5-year performance, JPIB leads with 2.76% vs 0.70% for CMBS. On fees, CMBS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JPIB has performed better with a 2.76% return vs 0.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
CMBS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for JPIB.
JPIB has the higher dividend yield at 5.00%, compared with 3.58% for CMBS.
CMBS is categorized as Mortgage Backed Securities, while JPIB is Global Bonds. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for CMBS and 0.50% for JPIB.
JPIB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.36 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CMBS and JPIB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer