CMB1.L vs. X7PS.L
CMB1.L (iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)) and X7PS.L (Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - CMB1.L tracks the FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR while X7PS.L tracks the Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CMB1.L returned 16.22%/yr vs 16.45%/yr for X7PS.L. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CMB1.L charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for X7PS.L.
Performance
CMB1.L vs. X7PS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CMB1.L is traded in GBp, while X7PS.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the X7PS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMB1.L achieves a 16.84% return, which is significantly higher than X7PS.L's 14.56% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CMB1.L having a 16.22% annualized return and X7PS.L not far ahead at 16.45%.
CMB1.L
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- 6M
- 15.33%
- YTD
- 16.84%
- 1Y
- 34.04%
- 3Y*
- 27.54%
- 5Y*
- 21.33%
- 10Y*
- 16.22%
X7PS.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.26%
- 6M
- 11.91%
- YTD
- 14.56%
- 1Y
- 49.84%
- 3Y*
- 44.04%
- 5Y*
- 31.75%
- 10Y*
- 16.45%
CMB1.L vs. X7PS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMB1.L iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) | 16.84% | 43.83% | 13.25% | 30.68% | -3.56% | 18.29% | 1.52% | 24.83% | -13.79% | 22.48% |
X7PS.L Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF | 14.56% | 87.84% | 27.12% | 23.19% | 5.63% | 30.02% | -18.45% | 7.52% | -25.50% | 16.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMB1.L and X7PS.L is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2011 | 0.76 |
The correlation between CMB1.L and X7PS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMB1.L vs. X7PS.L — Risk / Return Rank
CMB1.L
X7PS.L
CMB1.L vs. X7PS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L) and Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF (X7PS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CMB1.L | X7PS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.37 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | 3.10 | +0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.74 | 10.36 | +1.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CMB1.L vs. X7PS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMB1.L drawdown since its inception was -56.05%, roughly equal to the maximum X7PS.L drawdown of -56.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMB1.L and X7PS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMB1.L | X7PS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.05% | -56.34% | +0.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.32% | -16.07% | +5.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.62% | -18.22% | +2.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.19% | -30.73% | +6.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.61% | -56.34% | +19.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.96% | -1.80% | -1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.16% | -14.49% | -0.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 4.81% | -1.92% |
Volatility
CMB1.L vs. X7PS.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L) is 3.99%, while Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF (X7PS.L) has a volatility of 5.39%. This indicates that CMB1.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than X7PS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMB1.L | X7PS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.99% | 5.39% | -1.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.72% | 18.89% | -6.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.22% | 22.30% | -7.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 23.78% | -5.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.03% | 24.60% | -4.57% |
CMB1.L vs. X7PS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMB1.L has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than X7PS.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
CMB1.L vs. X7PS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CMB1.L nor X7PS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CMB1.L and X7PS.L have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, X7PS.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
X7PS.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CMB1.L.
CMB1.L tracks FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR, while X7PS.L tracks Invesco STOXX Europe 600 Optimised Banks UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CMB1.L and 0.30% for X7PS.L.
Find the right allocation for CMB1.L and X7PS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer