PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMB1.L vs. UKDV.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMB1.L vs. UKDV.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L) and SPDR S&P UK Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) (UKDV.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CMB1.L is traded in GBp, while UKDV.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the UKDV.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMB1.L achieves a 15.96% return, which is significantly higher than UKDV.L's 14.21% return. Over the past 10 years, CMB1.L has outperformed UKDV.L with an annualized return of 16.15%, while UKDV.L has yielded a comparatively lower 4.84% annualized return.


CMB1.L

1D
-0.43%
1M
-2.61%
6M
14.36%
YTD
15.96%
1Y
32.84%
3Y*
27.05%
5Y*
21.15%
10Y*
16.15%

UKDV.L

1D
0.89%
1M
7.56%
6M
10.02%
YTD
14.21%
1Y
20.90%
3Y*
15.87%
5Y*
7.90%
10Y*
4.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMB1.L vs. UKDV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMB1.L
iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)
15.96%43.83%13.25%30.68%-3.56%18.29%1.52%24.83%-13.79%22.48%
UKDV.L
SPDR S&P UK Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist)
14.21%16.89%10.35%5.75%-8.09%14.13%-17.26%32.17%-15.39%3.71%

Correlation

The correlation between CMB1.L and UKDV.L is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.54

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2012

0.58

The correlation between CMB1.L and UKDV.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.59 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CMB1.L vs. UKDV.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CMB1.L
UKDV.L

Financial Services

47.4%
23.8%

Utilities

15.6%
4.9%

Industrials

10.7%
23.7%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
6.8%

Energy

6.8%

-

Technology

5.7%
1.2%

Communication Services

1.9%
3.0%

Healthcare

1.1%
8.2%

Basic Materials

0.5%
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

0.4%
10.9%

Real Estate

0.3%
13.6%

Financial Services

CMB1.L
47.4%
UKDV.L
23.8%

Utilities

CMB1.L
15.6%
UKDV.L
4.9%

Industrials

CMB1.L
10.7%
UKDV.L
23.7%

Consumer Cyclical

CMB1.L
9.6%
UKDV.L
6.8%

Energy

CMB1.L
6.8%
UKDV.L

-

Technology

CMB1.L
5.7%
UKDV.L
1.2%

Communication Services

CMB1.L
1.9%
UKDV.L
3.0%

Healthcare

CMB1.L
1.1%
UKDV.L
8.2%

Basic Materials

CMB1.L
0.5%
UKDV.L
3.9%

Consumer Defensive

CMB1.L
0.4%
UKDV.L
10.9%

Real Estate

CMB1.L
0.3%
UKDV.L
13.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMB1.L vs. UKDV.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMB1.L
CMB1.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
CMB1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

UKDV.L
UKDV.L Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
UKDV.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UKDV.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
UKDV.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
UKDV.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
UKDV.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMB1.L vs. UKDV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L) and SPDR S&P UK Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) (UKDV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CMB1.LUKDV.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.27

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.17

1.98

+1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.26

6.70

+4.56

CMB1.L vs. UKDV.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMB1.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the UKDV.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMB1.L and UKDV.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CMB1.L vs. UKDV.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMB1.L drawdown since its inception was -56.05%, which is greater than UKDV.L's maximum drawdown of -38.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMB1.L and UKDV.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMB1.LUKDV.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.05%

-38.19%

-17.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.32%

-10.48%

+0.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.62%

-13.06%

-2.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.19%

-18.56%

-5.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.61%

-38.19%

+1.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.69%

0.00%

-3.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.16%

-7.61%

-7.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

3.11%

-0.20%

Volatility

CMB1.L vs. UKDV.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L) and SPDR S&P UK Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist) (UKDV.L) have volatilities of 3.90% and 3.90%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMB1.LUKDV.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.90%

3.90%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.73%

12.19%

+0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.21%

14.03%

+1.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.98%

14.27%

+3.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.03%

15.61%

+4.42%

CMB1.L vs. UKDV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMB1.L has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than UKDV.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

CMB1.L vs. UKDV.L - Dividend Comparison

CMB1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UKDV.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.20%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMB1.L
iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UKDV.L
SPDR S&P UK Dividend Aristocrats UCITS ETF (Dist)
3.20%3.65%3.40%3.65%4.54%3.64%3.27%4.05%4.67%3.78%4.28%3.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMB1.L and UKDV.L have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UKDV.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UKDV.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CMB1.L.

CMB1.L tracks FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR, while UKDV.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CMB1.L and 0.30% for UKDV.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMB1.L and UKDV.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer