PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMB1.L vs. STLAP.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMB1.L vs. STLAP.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L) and Stellantis NV (STLAP.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CMB1.L is traded in GBp, while STLAP.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the STLAP.PA values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMB1.L achieves a 13.66% return, which is significantly higher than STLAP.PA's -32.19% return. Over the past 10 years, CMB1.L has outperformed STLAP.PA with an annualized return of 16.09%, while STLAP.PA has yielded a comparatively lower -2.25% annualized return.


CMB1.L

1D
0.08%
1M
5.18%
YTD
13.66%
6M
17.10%
1Y
34.20%
3Y*
29.03%
5Y*
19.92%
10Y*
16.09%

STLAP.PA

1D
1.08%
1M
4.00%
YTD
-32.19%
6M
-37.61%
1Y
-23.99%
3Y*
-20.25%
5Y*
-12.35%
10Y*
-2.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMB1.L vs. STLAP.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CMB1.L
iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)
13.66%43.83%13.25%30.68%-3.56%18.29%1.52%24.83%-12.74%21.01%
STLAP.PA
Stellantis NV
-32.19%-14.67%-39.02%70.49%-9.65%-20.92%10.96%7.76%11.05%14.10%

Correlation

The correlation between CMB1.L and STLAP.PA is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2010

0.50

The correlation between CMB1.L and STLAP.PA shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMB1.L vs. STLAP.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMB1.L
CMB1.L Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CMB1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMB1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

STLAP.PA
STLAP.PA Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
STLAP.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STLAP.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
STLAP.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
STLAP.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
STLAP.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMB1.L vs. STLAP.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L) and Stellantis NV (STLAP.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMB1.LSTLAP.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

0.95

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.30

-0.50

+3.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.03

-1.01

+13.04

CMB1.L vs. STLAP.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMB1.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is higher than the STLAP.PA Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMB1.L and STLAP.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMB1.LSTLAP.PADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.26

-0.47

+2.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.11

-0.32

+1.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

-0.06

+0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

-0.18

+0.65

Drawdowns

CMB1.L vs. STLAP.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMB1.L drawdown since its inception was -47.37%, smaller than the maximum STLAP.PA drawdown of -92.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMB1.L and STLAP.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMB1.LSTLAP.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.37%

-92.01%

+44.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.32%

-47.32%

+37.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.62%

-76.06%

+60.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.19%

-76.06%

+51.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.61%

-76.06%

+39.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-80.53%

+79.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.80%

-63.54%

+54.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.84%

23.61%

-20.77%

Volatility

CMB1.L vs. STLAP.PA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L) is 4.47%, while Stellantis NV (STLAP.PA) has a volatility of 11.19%. This indicates that CMB1.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STLAP.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMB1.LSTLAP.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

11.19%

-6.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.15%

42.10%

-29.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.06%

50.57%

-35.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.00%

37.99%

-19.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.52%

38.93%

-19.41%

Dividends

CMB1.L vs. STLAP.PA - Dividend Comparison

Neither CMB1.L nor STLAP.PA has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
CMB1.L
iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
STLAP.PA
Stellantis NV
0.00%7.23%12.26%6.34%7.84%14.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMB1.L and STLAP.PA have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMB1.L and STLAP.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer