CMB1.L vs. LDEU.L
CMB1.L (iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)) and LDEU.L (L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF EUR Dis) are both Europe Equities funds - CMB1.L tracks the FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR while LDEU.L tracks the L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF EUR Dis. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CMB1.L returned 21.33%/yr vs 16.82%/yr for LDEU.L. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CMB1.L charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for LDEU.L.
Performance
CMB1.L vs. LDEU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CMB1.L is traded in GBp, while LDEU.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the LDEU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMB1.L achieves a 16.84% return, which is significantly higher than LDEU.L's 11.99% return.
CMB1.L
- 1D
- -1.50%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- 6M
- 15.33%
- YTD
- 16.84%
- 1Y
- 34.04%
- 3Y*
- 27.54%
- 5Y*
- 21.33%
- 10Y*
- 16.22%
LDEU.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- 6M
- 9.70%
- YTD
- 11.99%
- 1Y
- 26.76%
- 3Y*
- 24.77%
- 5Y*
- 16.82%
- 10Y*
- —
CMB1.L vs. LDEU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMB1.L iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) | 16.84% | 43.83% | 13.25% | 30.68% | -3.56% | 11.13% |
LDEU.L L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF EUR Dis | 11.99% | 44.92% | 9.43% | 14.43% | 1.84% | 5.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMB1.L and LDEU.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 12, 2021 | 0.85 |
The correlation between CMB1.L and LDEU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMB1.L vs. LDEU.L — Risk / Return Rank
CMB1.L
LDEU.L
CMB1.L vs. LDEU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L) and L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF EUR Dis (LDEU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CMB1.L | LDEU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.41 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | 3.40 | -0.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.74 | 12.02 | -0.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CMB1.L vs. LDEU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMB1.L drawdown since its inception was -56.05%, which is greater than LDEU.L's maximum drawdown of -17.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMB1.L and LDEU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMB1.L | LDEU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.05% | -17.44% | -38.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.32% | -7.91% | -2.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.62% | -13.34% | -2.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.19% | -17.44% | -6.75% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.96% | -1.58% | -1.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.16% | -2.98% | -12.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 2.24% | +0.65% |
Volatility
CMB1.L vs. LDEU.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L) has a higher volatility of 3.99% compared to L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF EUR Dis (LDEU.L) at 2.99%. This indicates that CMB1.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDEU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMB1.L | LDEU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.99% | 2.99% | +1.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.72% | 9.61% | +3.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.22% | 11.77% | +3.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.98% | 14.58% | +3.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.03% | 14.43% | +5.60% |
CMB1.L vs. LDEU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMB1.L has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than LDEU.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
CMB1.L vs. LDEU.L - Dividend Comparison
CMB1.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LDEU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMB1.L iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LDEU.L L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF EUR Dis | 3.52% | 3.47% | 4.36% | 4.44% | 4.17% | 2.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CMB1.L and LDEU.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LDEU.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LDEU.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CMB1.L.
CMB1.L tracks FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR, while LDEU.L tracks L&G Europe ex-UK Quality Dividends Equal Weight ETF EUR Dis. They also come from different issuers: iShares and L&G. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CMB1.L and 0.25% for LDEU.L.
Find the right allocation for CMB1.L and LDEU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer