CMB1.L vs. CSP1.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CMB1.L (iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)) and CSP1.L (iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CMB1.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR, while CSP1.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, CMB1.L returned 16.09%/yr vs 16.07%/yr for CSP1.L. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CMB1.L charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for CSP1.L.

Performance

CMB1.L vs. CSP1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMB1.L achieves a 13.66% return, which is significantly higher than CSP1.L's 10.55% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with CMB1.L having a 16.09% annualized return and CSP1.L not far behind at 16.07%.

CMB1.L

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 5.18%
• YTD: 13.66%
• 6M: 17.10%
• 1Y: 34.20%
• 3Y*: 29.03%
• 5Y*: 19.92%
• 10Y*: 16.09%

CSP1.L

• 1D: 0.05%
• 1M: 5.54%
• YTD: 10.55%
• 6M: 10.48%
• 1Y: 29.13%
• 3Y*: 19.02%
• 5Y*: 14.94%
• 10Y*: 16.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMB1.L vs. CSP1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CMB1.L iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc)	13.66%	43.83%	13.25%	30.68%	-3.56%	18.29%	1.52%	24.83%	-12.74%	21.01%
CSP1.L iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF	10.55%	9.37%	27.35%	19.79%	-9.05%	31.07%	13.65%	26.42%	0.01%	10.83%

Correlation

The correlation between CMB1.L and CSP1.L is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.43
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.51
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2010	0.53

The correlation between CMB1.L and CSP1.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (3 years) to 0.56 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CMB1.L vs. CSP1.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CMB1.L	CSP1.L
Financial Services	45.1%	11.3%
Utilities	17.2%	2.2%
Industrials	10.8%	7.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.0%	9.9%
Energy	8.8%	3.4%
Technology	4.6%	38.0%
Healthcare	1.1%	8.4%
Communication Services	1.1%	10.7%
Basic Materials	0.6%	1.7%
Consumer Defensive	0.5%	4.7%
Real Estate	0.3%	1.9%

Return for Risk

CMB1.L vs. CSP1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMB1.L

CMB1.L Risk / Return Rank: 68
CMB1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
CMB1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
CMB1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 67
CMB1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
CMB1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 67

CSP1.L

CSP1.L Risk / Return Rank: 82
CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
CSP1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
CSP1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 85
CSP1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
CSP1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMB1.L vs. CSP1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CMB1.L	CSP1.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.26	2.73	-0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.08	3.66	-0.58
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.51	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.30	4.07	-0.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.03	14.99	-2.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CMB1.L vs. CSP1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMB1.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMB1.L and CSP1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CMB1.L	CSP1.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.26	2.73	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.11	1.04	+0.06
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.82	1.03	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.47	1.09	-0.62

Drawdowns

CMB1.L vs. CSP1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMB1.L drawdown since its inception was -47.37%, which is greater than CSP1.L's maximum drawdown of -25.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMB1.L and CSP1.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMB1.L	CSP1.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-47.37%	-25.48%	-21.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.32%	-7.12%	-3.20%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.62%	-20.77%	+5.15%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.19%	-20.77%	-3.42%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.61%	-25.48%	-11.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.63%	-0.24%	-0.39%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.80%	-3.32%	-5.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.84%	1.94%	+0.90%

Volatility

CMB1.L vs. CSP1.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares FTSE MIB UCITS ETF (Acc) (CMB1.L) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) at 2.62%. This indicates that CMB1.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSP1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CMB1.L	CSP1.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.47%	2.62%	+1.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.15%	7.16%	+4.99%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.06%	10.62%	+4.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.00%	14.31%	+3.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.52%	15.57%	+3.95%

CMB1.L vs. CSP1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMB1.L has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than CSP1.L's 0.07% expense ratio.

Dividends

CMB1.L vs. CSP1.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither CMB1.L nor CSP1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CMB1.L and CSP1.L in my portfolio?

CMB1.L and CSP1.L have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CMB1.L or CSP1.L?

On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CMB1.L or CSP1.L?

CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for CMB1.L.

What is the main difference between CMB1.L and CSP1.L?

CMB1.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while CSP1.L is S&P 500. CMB1.L tracks FTSE Italia AllShare TR EUR, while CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for CMB1.L and 0.07% for CSP1.L.