PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMAAX vs. FRGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMAAX vs. FRGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Moderate Allocation Fund (CMAAX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CMAAX having a 8.33% return and FRGAX slightly higher at 8.73%.


CMAAX

1D
0.40%
1M
0.29%
6M
8.33%
YTD
8.33%
1Y
14.97%
3Y*
12.16%
5Y*
5.57%
10Y*
8.32%

FRGAX

1D
0.44%
1M
-0.37%
6M
8.73%
YTD
8.73%
1Y
18.09%
3Y*
15.23%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMAAX vs. FRGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CMAAX
Calvert Moderate Allocation Fund
8.33%12.70%10.06%12.87%-0.43%
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
8.73%17.10%12.91%17.57%-1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between CMAAX and FRGAX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2022

0.96

The correlation between CMAAX and FRGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMAAX vs. FRGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMAAX
CMAAX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
CMAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
CMAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

FRGAX
FRGAX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FRGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FRGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMAAX vs. FRGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Moderate Allocation Fund (CMAAX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CMAAXFRGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.35

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

2.58

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.09

11.14

-2.04

CMAAX vs. FRGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMAAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the FRGAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMAAX and FRGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CMAAX vs. FRGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMAAX drawdown since its inception was -42.64%, which is greater than FRGAX's maximum drawdown of -11.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMAAX and FRGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMAAXFRGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.64%

-11.77%

-30.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.33%

-7.03%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.26%

-11.77%

+0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-0.59%

+0.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.54%

-1.58%

-3.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.69%

1.62%

+0.07%

Volatility

CMAAX vs. FRGAX - Volatility Comparison

Calvert Moderate Allocation Fund (CMAAX) and Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund (FRGAX) have volatilities of 3.89% and 3.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMAAXFRGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.89%

3.98%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.93%

7.99%

-0.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.37%

9.63%

-0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.05%

10.40%

+0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.07%

10.40%

+0.67%

CMAAX vs. FRGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMAAX has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than FRGAX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

CMAAX vs. FRGAX - Dividend Comparison

CMAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.24%, more than FRGAX's 1.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CMAAX
Calvert Moderate Allocation Fund
4.24%4.55%2.99%6.69%1.82%4.24%4.18%4.35%5.88%2.71%5.05%12.52%
FRGAX
Fidelity 70% Allocation Fund
1.84%2.00%2.01%1.77%1.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, CMAAX and FRGAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FRGAX has higher volatility (3.98%) compared to CMAAX (3.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMAAX dropped -42.64% vs FRGAX's -11.77%.

FRGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMAAX and FRGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer