CM5S.L vs. CNEG.L
CM5S.L (Invesco S&P China A MidCap 500 Swap UCITS ETF Acc) and CNEG.L (Amundi MSCI China ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR (C)) are both China Equities funds - CM5S.L tracks the MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY while CNEG.L tracks the MSCI China NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CM5S.L returned 19.85%/yr vs 4.28%/yr for CNEG.L. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.35% expense ratio.
Performance
CM5S.L vs. CNEG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CM5S.L achieves a 19.25% return, which is significantly higher than CNEG.L's -8.89% return.
CM5S.L
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 2.36%
- YTD
- 19.25%
- 6M
- 27.95%
- 1Y
- 71.20%
- 3Y*
- 19.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CNEG.L
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -0.44%
- YTD
- -8.89%
- 6M
- -10.31%
- 1Y
- 3.32%
- 3Y*
- 4.28%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CM5S.L vs. CNEG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CM5S.L Invesco S&P China A MidCap 500 Swap UCITS ETF Acc | 19.25% | 42.07% | 14.29% | -14.04% | 13.69% |
CNEG.L Amundi MSCI China ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR (C) | -8.89% | 23.90% | 11.58% | -14.99% | 4.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between CM5S.L and CNEG.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2022 | 0.61 |
The correlation between CM5S.L and CNEG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CM5S.L vs. CNEG.L — Risk / Return Rank
CM5S.L
CNEG.L
CM5S.L vs. CNEG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P China A MidCap 500 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (CM5S.L) and Amundi MSCI China ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR (C) (CNEG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CM5S.L | CNEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.04 | +0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.48 | 0.16 | +5.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.45 | 0.32 | +21.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CM5S.L | CNEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.49 | 0.16 | +3.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | -0.16 | +0.83 |
Drawdowns
CM5S.L vs. CNEG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CM5S.L drawdown since its inception was -38.57%, smaller than the maximum CNEG.L drawdown of -46.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CM5S.L and CNEG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CM5S.L | CNEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.57% | -46.55% | +7.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.93% | -20.54% | +7.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.12% | -26.84% | +0.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.43% | -22.79% | +18.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.46% | -26.63% | +13.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.31% | 10.43% | -7.12% |
Volatility
CM5S.L vs. CNEG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P China A MidCap 500 Swap UCITS ETF Acc (CM5S.L) is 6.29%, while Amundi MSCI China ESG Leaders Select UCITS ETF DR (C) (CNEG.L) has a volatility of 7.88%. This indicates that CM5S.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNEG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CM5S.L | CNEG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.29% | 7.88% | -1.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.26% | 14.68% | +0.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.30% | 20.42% | -0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.03% | 31.48% | -6.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.03% | 31.48% | -6.45% |
CM5S.L vs. CNEG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CM5S.L and CNEG.L have an expense ratio of 0.35%.
Dividends
CM5S.L vs. CNEG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither CM5S.L nor CNEG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CM5S.L and CNEG.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.35% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CM5S.L and CNEG.L have the same expense ratio: 0.35% per year.
CM5S.L tracks MSCI China A Onshore NR CNY, while CNEG.L tracks MSCI China NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Amundi.
Find the right allocation for CM5S.L and CNEG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer