PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLTC.DE vs. SETH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLTC.DE vs. SETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CoinShares Physical Litecoin (LTC) EUR (CLTC.DE) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CLTC.DE is traded in EUR, while SETH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SETH values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLTC.DE achieves a -38.45% return, which is significantly lower than SETH's 44.74% return.


CLTC.DE

1D
0.11%
1M
-13.93%
YTD
-38.45%
6M
-43.65%
1Y
-48.83%
3Y*
-23.64%
5Y*
10Y*

SETH

1D
1.41%
1M
33.37%
YTD
44.74%
6M
49.44%
1Y
-1.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLTC.DE vs. SETH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
CLTC.DE
CoinShares Physical Litecoin (LTC) EUR
-38.45%-33.53%39.59%7.26%
SETH
ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF
44.74%-37.79%-46.26%-25.70%

Correlation

The correlation between CLTC.DE and SETH is -0.65, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2023

-0.54

The correlation between CLTC.DE and SETH shifts across timeframes, from -0.65 (1 year) to -0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLTC.DE vs. SETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLTC.DE
CLTC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CLTC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLTC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLTC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CLTC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLTC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

SETH
SETH Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
SETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
SETH Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
SETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
SETH Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLTC.DE vs. SETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Litecoin (LTC) EUR (CLTC.DE) and ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLTC.DESETHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.05

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.77

-0.03

-0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.24

-0.04

-1.19

CLTC.DE vs. SETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLTC.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.80, which is lower than the SETH Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLTC.DE and SETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLTC.DESETHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.80

-0.02

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.31

-0.47

+0.16

Drawdowns

CLTC.DE vs. SETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLTC.DE drawdown since its inception was -84.88%, roughly equal to the maximum SETH drawdown of -82.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLTC.DE and SETH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLTC.DESETHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.88%

-82.53%

-2.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-63.63%

-56.52%

-7.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-84.86%

-64.05%

-20.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.45%

-56.53%

-8.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.63%

36.24%

+3.39%

Volatility

CLTC.DE vs. SETH - Volatility Comparison

CoinShares Physical Litecoin (LTC) EUR (CLTC.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.65% compared to ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF (SETH) at 9.97%. This indicates that CLTC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLTC.DESETHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.65%

9.97%

+1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.99%

46.26%

-10.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.87%

69.70%

-8.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

75.60%

70.10%

+5.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.60%

70.10%

+5.50%

CLTC.DE vs. SETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLTC.DE has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SETH's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLTC.DE vs. SETH - Dividend Comparison

CLTC.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SETH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.75%.


PositionTTM202520242023
CLTC.DE
CoinShares Physical Litecoin (LTC) EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SETH
ProShares Short Ether Strategy ETF
10.75%7.01%3.44%0.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLTC.DE and SETH have a correlation of -0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SETH is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SETH is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CLTC.DE.

They also come from different issuers: CoinShares and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CLTC.DE and 0.95% for SETH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLTC.DE and SETH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer