PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLTC.DE vs. ETH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLTC.DE vs. ETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in CoinShares Physical Litecoin (LTC) EUR (CLTC.DE) and Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF (ETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CLTC.DE is traded in EUR, while ETH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ETH values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with CLTC.DE having a -38.45% return and ETH slightly lower at -39.23%.


CLTC.DE

1D
0.11%
1M
-13.93%
YTD
-38.45%
6M
-43.65%
1Y
-48.83%
3Y*
-23.64%
5Y*
10Y*

ETH

1D
-1.71%
1M
-24.67%
YTD
-39.23%
6M
-42.98%
1Y
-32.97%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLTC.DE vs. ETH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CLTC.DE
CoinShares Physical Litecoin (LTC) EUR
-38.45%-33.53%46.00%
ETH
Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF
-39.23%-21.47%0.96%

Correlation

The correlation between CLTC.DE and ETH is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2024

0.60

The correlation between CLTC.DE and ETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLTC.DE vs. ETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLTC.DE
CLTC.DE Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
CLTC.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLTC.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLTC.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CLTC.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLTC.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

ETH
ETH Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
ETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETH Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
ETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETH Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLTC.DE vs. ETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CoinShares Physical Litecoin (LTC) EUR (CLTC.DE) and Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF (ETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLTC.DEETHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

0.96

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.77

-0.53

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.24

-0.88

-0.36

CLTC.DE vs. ETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLTC.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.80, which is lower than the ETH Sharpe Ratio of -0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLTC.DE and ETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLTC.DEETHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.80

-0.49

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.31

-0.45

+0.14

Drawdowns

CLTC.DE vs. ETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLTC.DE drawdown since its inception was -84.88%, which is greater than ETH's maximum drawdown of -65.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLTC.DE and ETH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLTC.DEETHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-84.88%

-65.39%

-19.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-63.63%

-62.65%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-70.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-84.86%

-62.65%

-22.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.45%

-33.55%

-31.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.63%

37.58%

+2.05%

Volatility

CLTC.DE vs. ETH - Volatility Comparison

CoinShares Physical Litecoin (LTC) EUR (CLTC.DE) has a higher volatility of 11.65% compared to Grayscale Ethereum Staking Mini ETF (ETH) at 9.50%. This indicates that CLTC.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLTC.DEETHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.65%

9.50%

+2.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.99%

44.73%

-8.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

60.87%

67.51%

-6.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

75.60%

72.52%

+3.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

75.60%

72.52%

+3.08%

CLTC.DE vs. ETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLTC.DE has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ETH's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLTC.DE vs. ETH - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLTC.DE nor ETH has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CLTC.DE and ETH have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ETH is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ETH is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for CLTC.DE.

They also come from different issuers: CoinShares and Grayscale. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for CLTC.DE and 0.15% for ETH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLTC.DE and ETH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer