CLSX vs. SOXL
CLSX (Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF) and SOXL (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. CLSX is actively managed, while SOXL is passively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CLSX charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SOXL.
Performance
CLSX vs. SOXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLSX achieves a 60.09% return, which is significantly lower than SOXL's 446.21% return.
CLSX
- 1D
- -11.28%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- 60.09%
- 6M
- 24.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SOXL
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 20.47%
- YTD
- 446.21%
- 6M
- 419.27%
- 1Y
- 858.82%
- 3Y*
- 120.25%
- 5Y*
- 42.22%
- 10Y*
- 64.42%
CLSX vs. SOXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CLSX Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF | 60.09% | -35.55% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 446.21% | 40.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLSX and SOXL is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLSX vs. SOXL — Risk / Return Rank
CLSX
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SOXL
CLSX vs. SOXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF (CLSX) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF (SOXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLSX | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.56 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 19.95 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 63.67 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLSX vs. SOXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLSX drawdown since its inception was -93.16%, roughly equal to the maximum SOXL drawdown of -90.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSX and SOXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLSX | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.16% | -90.46% | -2.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -43.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -87.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -90.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -90.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.32% | -23.67% | -53.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.47% | -34.95% | -34.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 13.60% | — |
Volatility
CLSX vs. SOXL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLSX | SOXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 68.18% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 99.65% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 190.49% | 116.81% | +73.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 190.49% | 110.33% | +80.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 190.49% | 100.60% | +89.89% |
CLSX vs. SOXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLSX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXL's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLSX vs. SOXL - Dividend Comparison
Neither CLSX nor SOXL has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLSX Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SOXL Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bull 3X ETF | 0.00% | 0.34% | 1.18% | 0.51% | 1.07% | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.38% | 1.30% | 0.09% | 4.84% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLSX and SOXL have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SOXL is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SOXL is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CLSX.
CLSX and SOXL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CLSX and 0.75% for SOXL.
Find the right allocation for CLSX and SOXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer