CLSX vs. BLSX
CLSX (Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF) and BLSX (Tradr 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr ETFs. Both are actively managed. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 1.30% expense ratio.
Performance
CLSX vs. BLSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CLSX
- 1D
- -11.28%
- 1M
- -2.59%
- YTD
- 60.09%
- 6M
- 24.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLSX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLSX vs. BLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CLSX Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF | 60.09% | -71.65% |
BLSX Tradr 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF | -24.41% | -55.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLSX and BLSX is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2025 | 0.51 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLSX vs. BLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF (CLSX) and Tradr 2X Long BLSH Daily ETF (BLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLSX vs. BLSX - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLSX | BLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -77.32% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.47% | — | — |
Volatility
CLSX vs. BLSX - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLSX | BLSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 190.49% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 190.49% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 190.49% | — | — |
CLSX vs. BLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both CLSX and BLSX have an expense ratio of 1.30%.
Dividends
CLSX vs. BLSX - Dividend Comparison
Neither CLSX nor BLSX has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CLSX and BLSX have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CLSX and BLSX have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.
CLSX and BLSX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
Find the right allocation for CLSX and BLSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer