CLSPX vs. RIPIX
CLSPX (Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund) and RIPIX (Royce International Premier Fund Institutional Class) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, CLSPX returned 6.94%/yr vs -4.60%/yr for RIPIX. Their 0.60 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. CLSPX charges 0.86%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for RIPIX.
Performance
CLSPX vs. RIPIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLSPX achieves a 12.95% return, which is significantly higher than RIPIX's 1.12% return.
CLSPX
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -5.51%
- 6M
- 10.11%
- YTD
- 12.95%
- 1Y
- 14.77%
- 3Y*
- 17.89%
- 5Y*
- 6.94%
- 10Y*
- 13.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.02%
RIPIX
- 1D
- -0.78%
- 1M
- -0.94%
- 6M
- 0.48%
- YTD
- 1.12%
- 1Y
- -3.41%
- 3Y*
- 2.13%
- 5Y*
- -4.60%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 2.09%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
CLSPX vs. RIPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLSPX Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund | 12.95% | 15.16% | 23.97% | 25.25% | -31.25% | 16.39% | 35.43% | 35.25% | -11.36% |
RIPIX Royce International Premier Fund Institutional Class | 1.12% | 9.89% | -7.04% | 8.14% | -26.99% | 6.22% | 16.11% | 34.69% | -12.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLSPX and RIPIX is 0.54, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.61 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2018 | 0.60 |
The correlation between CLSPX and RIPIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLSPX vs. RIPIX — Risk / Return Rank
CLSPX
RIPIX
CLSPX vs. RIPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund (CLSPX) and Royce International Premier Fund Institutional Class (RIPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLSPX | RIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.81 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 0.97 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | -0.22 | +1.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.04 | -0.54 | +3.58 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLSPX vs. RIPIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLSPX drawdown since its inception was -68.54%, which is greater than RIPIX's maximum drawdown of -41.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSPX and RIPIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLSPX | RIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.54% | -41.89% | -26.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.64% | -15.33% | +1.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.36% | -17.28% | -10.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.35% | -41.89% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.88% | -25.47% | +17.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.19% | -18.16% | +1.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.28% | 6.22% | -1.94% |
Volatility
CLSPX vs. RIPIX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund (CLSPX) has a higher volatility of 7.47% compared to Royce International Premier Fund Institutional Class (RIPIX) at 4.63%. This indicates that CLSPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIPIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLSPX | RIPIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.47% | 4.63% | +2.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.99% | 11.55% | +7.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.08% | 13.79% | +9.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.39% | 15.54% | +9.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.98% | 16.12% | +6.86% |
CLSPX vs. RIPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLSPX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than RIPIX's 1.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLSPX vs. RIPIX - Dividend Comparison
CLSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.62%, more than RIPIX's 1.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLSPX Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund | 10.62% | 11.99% | 12.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 21.10% | 15.38% | 8.30% | 26.41% | 13.16% | 6.15% | 17.11% |
RIPIX Royce International Premier Fund Institutional Class | 1.44% | 1.46% | 5.66% | 3.09% | 3.87% | 5.02% | 0.36% | 0.58% | 0.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLSPX and RIPIX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLSPX has higher volatility (7.47%) compared to RIPIX (4.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLSPX dropped -68.54% vs RIPIX's -41.89%.
CLSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.57 vs -0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLSPX and RIPIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer