PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLSPX vs. POAGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLSPX vs. POAGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund (CLSPX) and PrimeCap Odyssey Aggressive Growth Fund (POAGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLSPX achieves a 19.07% return, which is significantly lower than POAGX's 25.05% return. Over the past 10 years, CLSPX has underperformed POAGX with an annualized return of 14.05%, while POAGX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.87% annualized return.


CLSPX

1D
0.21%
1M
9.79%
YTD
19.07%
6M
18.10%
1Y
30.47%
3Y*
23.18%
5Y*
10.46%
10Y*
14.05%

POAGX

1D
0.48%
1M
16.75%
YTD
25.05%
6M
26.41%
1Y
60.37%
3Y*
25.56%
5Y*
10.82%
10Y*
15.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLSPX vs. POAGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CLSPX
Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund
19.07%15.16%23.97%25.25%-31.25%16.39%35.43%35.25%-5.22%22.86%
POAGX
PrimeCap Odyssey Aggressive Growth Fund
25.05%28.68%12.56%25.02%-24.25%4.02%29.17%23.52%-7.10%33.60%

Correlation

The correlation between CLSPX and POAGX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2004

0.88

The correlation between CLSPX and POAGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLSPX vs. POAGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLSPX
CLSPX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
CLSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
CLSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

POAGX
POAGX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
POAGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POAGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
POAGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
POAGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
POAGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLSPX vs. POAGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund (CLSPX) and PrimeCap Odyssey Aggressive Growth Fund (POAGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLSPXPOAGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.52

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

3.71

-1.35

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.35

15.14

-6.79

CLSPX vs. POAGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLSPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is lower than the POAGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLSPX and POAGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLSPXPOAGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

3.07

-1.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.47

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

0.70

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.64

-0.20

Drawdowns

CLSPX vs. POAGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSPX drawdown since its inception was -68.54%, which is greater than POAGX's maximum drawdown of -55.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSPX and POAGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLSPXPOAGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.54%

-55.77%

-12.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.64%

-16.87%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.36%

-24.73%

-2.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.35%

-38.80%

-4.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.35%

-38.80%

-4.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.24%

-9.54%

-6.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.85%

4.12%

-0.27%

Volatility

CLSPX vs. POAGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund (CLSPX) is 6.35%, while PrimeCap Odyssey Aggressive Growth Fund (POAGX) has a volatility of 7.94%. This indicates that CLSPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POAGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLSPXPOAGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.35%

7.94%

-1.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.86%

16.25%

+0.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.25%

20.35%

+0.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.07%

22.90%

+2.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.84%

22.90%

-0.06%

CLSPX vs. POAGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLSPX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than POAGX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLSPX vs. POAGX - Dividend Comparison

CLSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.07%, less than POAGX's 10.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLSPX
Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund
10.07%11.99%12.87%0.00%0.00%21.10%15.38%8.30%26.41%13.16%6.15%17.11%
POAGX
PrimeCap Odyssey Aggressive Growth Fund
10.60%13.25%9.90%5.54%10.78%5.93%7.84%5.33%7.82%0.86%16.63%12.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLSPX and POAGX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

POAGX has higher volatility (7.94%) compared to CLSPX (6.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLSPX dropped -68.54% vs POAGX's -55.77%.

POAGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.07 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLSPX and POAGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer