CLSPX vs. PKSFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund (CLSPX) and Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund (PKSFX).
CLSPX is managed by Columbia. It was launched on Nov 20, 1985. PKSFX is managed by Virtus. It was launched on Oct 18, 1996.
Performance
CLSPX vs. PKSFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CLSPX vs. PKSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLSPX Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund | -7.47% | 15.16% | 23.97% | 25.25% | -31.25% | 16.39% | 35.43% | 35.25% | -5.22% | 22.86% |
PKSFX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund | -0.51% | -2.58% | 13.67% | 32.32% | -10.77% | 19.03% | 21.38% | 40.21% | -1.99% | 34.98% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLSPX achieves a -7.47% return, which is significantly lower than PKSFX's -0.51% return. Over the past 10 years, CLSPX has underperformed PKSFX with an annualized return of 11.32%, while PKSFX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.75% annualized return.
CLSPX
- 1D
- -2.02%
- 1M
- -11.48%
- YTD
- -7.47%
- 6M
- -10.69%
- 1Y
- 18.53%
- 3Y*
- 14.17%
- 5Y*
- 5.24%
- 10Y*
- 11.32%
PKSFX
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- -7.55%
- YTD
- -0.51%
- 6M
- -1.30%
- 1Y
- 2.15%
- 3Y*
- 9.64%
- 5Y*
- 7.73%
- 10Y*
- 14.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CLSPX vs. PKSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLSPX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is lower than PKSFX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CLSPX vs. PKSFX — Risk / Return Rank
CLSPX
PKSFX
CLSPX vs. PKSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund (CLSPX) and Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund (PKSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLSPX | PKSFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.71 | 0.14 | +0.58 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.13 | 0.35 | +0.78 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.04 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 0.09 | +1.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.80 | 0.19 | +3.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLSPX | PKSFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 0.14 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.43 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.79 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.56 | -0.14 |
Correlation
The correlation between CLSPX and PKSFX is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CLSPX vs. PKSFX - Dividend Comparison
CLSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.96%, less than PKSFX's 14.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLSPX Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund | 12.96% | 11.99% | 12.87% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 21.10% | 15.38% | 8.30% | 26.41% | 13.16% | 6.15% | 17.11% |
PKSFX Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund | 14.37% | 14.30% | 4.07% | 4.12% | 6.65% | 12.05% | 7.45% | 4.03% | 4.33% | 0.17% | 5.69% | 19.83% |
Drawdowns
CLSPX vs. PKSFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLSPX drawdown since its inception was -68.54%, which is greater than PKSFX's maximum drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSPX and PKSFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLSPX | PKSFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.54% | -54.46% | -14.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.64% | -11.21% | -2.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.35% | -22.02% | -21.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.35% | -33.45% | -9.90% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.64% | -11.25% | -2.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.30% | -7.17% | -9.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.07% | 4.92% | -0.85% |
Volatility
CLSPX vs. PKSFX - Volatility Comparison
Columbia Select Mid Cap Growth Fund (CLSPX) has a higher volatility of 8.39% compared to Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core Fund (PKSFX) at 4.01%. This indicates that CLSPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PKSFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CLSPX | PKSFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.39% | 4.01% | +4.38% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.39% | 10.93% | +5.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.56% | 18.88% | +6.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.87% | 17.88% | +6.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.64% | 18.78% | +3.86% |