PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLSD vs. ATYR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CLSD vs. ATYR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clearside Biomedical, Inc. (CLSD) and aTyr Pharma, Inc. (ATYR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

Over the past 10 years, CLSD has underperformed ATYR with an annualized return of -42.62%, while ATYR has yielded a comparatively higher -36.72% annualized return.


CLSD

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
-96.28%
3Y*
-71.25%
5Y*
-60.63%
10Y*
-42.62%

ATYR

1D
-3.83%
1M
-40.67%
YTD
-36.14%
6M
-35.12%
1Y
-90.72%
3Y*
-40.04%
5Y*
-35.73%
10Y*
-36.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLSD vs. ATYR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CLSD
Clearside Biomedical, Inc.
0.00%-97.12%-18.80%4.46%-59.27%0.36%-5.52%171.03%-84.71%-21.70%
ATYR
aTyr Pharma, Inc.
-36.14%-78.37%156.74%-35.62%-70.68%92.53%-6.95%-39.91%-85.84%62.79%

Correlation

The correlation between CLSD and ATYR is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2016

0.18

The correlation between CLSD and ATYR shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.22 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CLSD:

$2.15M

ATYR:

$49.03M

EPS

CLSD:

-$4.99

ATYR:

-$0.73

PS Ratio

CLSD:

0.64

ATYR:

252.24

Total Revenue (TTM)

CLSD:

$3.33M

ATYR:

$190.00K

Gross Profit (TTM)

CLSD:

$2.85M

ATYR:

-$22.33M

EBITDA (TTM)

CLSD:

-$14.37M

ATYR:

-$71.35M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Clearside Biomedical, Inc.

aTyr Pharma, Inc.

Return for Risk

CLSD vs. ATYR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLSD
CLSD Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
CLSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLSD Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
CLSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 00
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLSD Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

ATYR
ATYR Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
ATYR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATYR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATYR Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
ATYR Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATYR Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLSD vs. ATYR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clearside Biomedical, Inc. (CLSD) and aTyr Pharma, Inc. (ATYR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLSDATYRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.76

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.54

0.88

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-1.01

-0.97

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.31

-1.21

-0.10

CLSD vs. ATYR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLSD Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is comparable to the ATYR Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLSD and ATYR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLSDATYRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.69

-0.65

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.66

-0.40

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.46

-0.42

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.46

-0.47

+0.01

Drawdowns

CLSD vs. ATYR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSD drawdown since its inception was -99.89%, roughly equal to the maximum ATYR drawdown of -99.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSD and ATYR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLSDATYRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.89%

-99.90%

+0.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-96.91%

-94.01%

-2.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-98.65%

-94.01%

-4.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-99.62%

-96.83%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.89%

-99.55%

-0.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.89%

-99.87%

-0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-83.74%

-93.18%

+9.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

70.11%

74.79%

-4.68%

Volatility

CLSD vs. ATYR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Clearside Biomedical, Inc. (CLSD) is 0.00%, while aTyr Pharma, Inc. (ATYR) has a volatility of 82.02%. This indicates that CLSD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ATYR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLSDATYRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.00%

82.02%

-82.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

126.86%

95.15%

+31.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

141.62%

140.03%

+1.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

93.89%

89.65%

+4.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

93.71%

88.34%

+5.37%

Dividends

CLSD vs. ATYR - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLSD nor ATYR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CLSD vs. ATYR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Clearside Biomedical, Inc. and aTyr Pharma, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00M10.00M15.00M20.00M25.00M20222023202420252026
201.00K
0
(CLSD) Total Revenue
(ATYR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CLSD and ATYR have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ATYR has higher volatility (82.02%) compared to CLSD (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLSD dropped -99.89% vs ATYR's -99.90%.

ATYR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.65 vs -0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLSD and ATYR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer